[home][rumors and news][model release matrix][tov motorsports][desktop calendar][exhaust notes][tov forums][links][search][sponsors][garage][login]

Tire Rack Upgrade Garage
 Search for a Dealer:
 Canadian Flag US Flag
 Honda Acura
 ZIP  
Acura
There are currently no active Acura promotions
Honda
There are currently no active Honda promotions
Honda releases info on 2025 Civic Hybrid. "the most powerful non-Type R Civic ever"
More.......................
A little Prelude tidbit that came from last week's dealer meeting...
More.......................
Acura releases details on upcoming 2025 MDX refresh
More.......................
Acura confirms debut of long-rumored entry-premium CUV for early 2025
More.......................
American Honda reports March and 1st Quarter 2024 sales results
More.......................
Spied on the Street! 2025 Acura MDX Type S
More.......................
Honda releases details on upcoming 2025 Fuel-Cell Plug-in CR-V
More.......................
Honda enables Wireless CarPlay and Android Auto on 10th generation Accords via software upgrade
More.......................
General Talk --> Re: Honda e: NS2
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: 2025 Civic Hybrid Reviews are out
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Honda to end production of mini bikes amid stricter emissions rules
Join Discussion......
Videos --> Re: Is America Ready for Chinese Cars?
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: Freightliner under investigation, along with Honda and Tesla for Phantom Braking
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: The Old Man's thoughts about Honda's future
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: The engineer who went off-roading to help build Honda’s most rugged vehicle
Join Discussion......
Videos --> Re: Woman rebuilds CB1300
Join Discussion......
Videos --> Why Hondas Run Great - JIT Manufacturing, 5S Methodology and Kaizen
Join Discussion......
Videos --> Re: What Went Wrong?? Dead At 30K Miles!? Mazda Skyactiv-G 2.5 CX30 Engine Teardown
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Toyota, Honda and Mazda all cheated on their safety tests
Join Discussion......
Strictly Technical --> Re: K1 Attack
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Honda is launching its new electric N-VAN e starting at $15,500
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Newey makes "secret" visit to Aston Martin??
Join Discussion......
Amateur Racing & Driving --> Re: 2022 Subaru BRZ at Area 27
Join Discussion......
Jump to:
The Test Drive - Canyons and Beaches

Being a former resident of Malibu and an avid car enthusiast, I am naturally quite familiar with the many canyons and twisty bits that connect Malibu to the real world. And after hearing that the FCX Clarity incorporated a weight distribution far closer to 50/50 than other FWD Honda cars, along with a low center of gravity and right now torque, I was quite eager to put the car to the test on some familiar roads. Our first leg took us up Malibu Canyon to Mulholland Drive heading north. You may have seen this road in some of our TOV videos before. The initial part of the road is about 5 miles long and climbs about 500-600 feet with gentle switchbacks carved into the hills, before dipping deep into a valley and then flattening out before reaching a crossroads and stop sign. Most of the corners are relatively constant radius with slight cambering, so you get a good feel for grip while the switchbacks help diagnose transient behavior. Straightaway speeds can get quite high on this section of road too if one dares (over 100 mph easily), but we got out of the accelerator once we'd exited a corner to avoid any unnecessary law enforcement attention.

As I bent the FCX Clarity into the first left-hander, I was trying hard to get a feel for the motion adaptive EPS, but steering response was linear and weighty, if not particularly feelsome (hardly a rare complaint on FWD Hondas these days, but this isn't a sports car either). The promises made by the Clarity's firm highway ride were kept as the chassis stayed flat and balanced through the turn. Understeer, at least at this speed, was far less than I expected. The road quickly snaked back to the right and the front end responded obediently to the steering wheel. Despite the rather high weight of the Clarity, its ability to rotate about its vertical axis was quite impressive. I never felt like I was fighting the weight of the front end as I have in cars such as the last generation Accord V6 - due in no small part I'm sure to the compact and low mounted electric motor. Because the chassis seemed to have plenty of grip, I began to apply power early in this corner to measure the effect of throttle on the car's attitude. Going from about 30kW to 60 kW at mid-corner did little to upset the chassis. The cornering speed simply went up and understeer increased just a touch, but it was still less than what you'd find in your typical Accord of Civic. By the way, how cool is that power meter - "well, she had plenty of grip until I got to about 70 kW in that corner and then the front end began to wash out...". The story was pretty much the same for the remainder of the 5 miles. A grippy, balanced chassis with plenty of punch to pull out of corners and no surprises. I was a little worried that Sara, sitting in the back seat, might get a little car sick, but she was fine and noted that the controlled ride and lack of pitching and bobbing made the run quite tolerable.

The next section of Mulholland Drive that I was interested in was from the famous Rock Store all the way up to Kanann-Dume Road. To get there you have to drive _slowly_ through a mildly residential area before you begin a long and twisty climb through some very tight turns (average speed below 30 mph). On the transitional leg, I spent some more time getting a feel for the ride quality as the road surface, while not horrible, has plenty of graining and small bumps. The FCX Clarity handled the terrain well, with a firm, controlled ride that felt relatively long legged. Interestingly, I said virtually the same thing about the new Accord Coupe V6 6MT. Maybe there is a new suspension philosophy at Honda. However, I did think that maybe the ride was too firm for the average commuter. You can feel most of what is happening even if it isn't objectionable. Call it a BMW style ride if you like. I don't think any future owners (barring myself :) will drive as hard as we did and take advantage of the firm chassis, so a softer ride may be more widely accepted (see RDX for a chassis I love, but that maybe doesn't fit the target market as well as it could). When I told this to VP Ben Knight after the drive was over, he smirked and said he'd be sure to let it be known that Shawn Church was asking for a softer ride - my reputation will never be the same :).

After we passed the Rock Store we picked up the pace again. The tight turns in this section of road are notorious for generating understeer in virtually any car, no matter what the drivetrain configuration. Of course, the Clarity was no exception. Turn in was excellent, but in the end, the front end would begin to wash out, and could be made worse with extra throttle application - the excellent torque overwhelming traction and spinning up the inside wheel. However, in comparison to other cars we've taken through these roads, the FCX was no worse than a Civic Si (last two generations) and not much behind the AP2 S2000 - the only difference being the S2000 could rotate the rear in certain corners if you got it down into first gear. Again, the Clarity is no sports car, but the layout of the chassis and the firm suspension endow it with capabilities far beyond what most owners will ever need or use.

Once we made it to Kanan-Dume Road, we headed back down toward the beaches. This was a more leisurely section as it is heavily patrolled. The road has many long, steep downhills where an inattentive driver can quickly find themselves 15-20 mph over the speed limit with flashing lights in the rearview mirror. In light of this, I found it a useful place to test the durability of the FCX Clarity's brakes. And while tire grip limits peak braking force, the use of regenerative braking on the Clarity means that brake fade is unlikely to be an issue. Even hitting the brakes excessively and abusively on a long downhill never revealed any fade or overheating. It should also be noted that the Clarity's battery lasts a long time and recharges quite quickly. On our dash up Mulholland Drive we never depleted the battery and always had full assist, but by the top the battery was on its last two bars of charge. Yet, within 1 minute and a mild slope, it was almost fully recharged. A far superior performance to that of Honda's hybrids, and also a big step up from the FCX V4's ultra-capacitor (which surprised me). It appears that the decision to use a high output battery rather than a high energy density unit was a good one - Honda's claims of 57% renegeneration energy recovery (vs. 46% for the FCX V4 and around 30% for hybrids) seem reasonable in light of this.

With the more dynamic parts of the test drive now taken care of, I decided to stop at a local beach for some photos, as well as to see how the new car played to jaded California locals. We went to a relatively sparsely occupied area and parked the car for photos. Within a few minutes we were answering questions from a beach cleanup crew, including one very knowledgeable Honda enthusiast who already knew about bio-fabric and some other technologies - but he'd never been to TOV! I gave him a business card to correct that problem. Joggers and bicyclists also seemed to gravitate toward the Clarity, craning their necks to see what was under the open hood. I heard one gentleman tell his daughter that the car ran on water and that it was the future. In fact, while interest was commendably high, I was quite surprised by the level of awareness people had about the FCX Clarity and fuel cells. Maybe there'd been a news report from the auto show on a local TV station, or maybe Honda has better eco-recognition among savvy California car buyers than I thought. Soon enough though, we'd taken enough photos and our time was drawing short, so we began the 20 mile trip back to Santa Monica.

In the end, we drove about 80 miles in the FCX Clarity, consumed about a third tank of hydrogen according to the fuel gauge on the dash and learned a whole lot about what will be in your garage in the next decade. Simply put, I'm impressed. Would I want this to be my only car, even with improved range? No, there is still plenty of room for gasoline powered cars. But make no mistake, this is the future. For all the naysayers in the past (myself included) who didn't believe, and even the so called experts today who say it can't work, well, you've been proven wrong in a big way. Switching to hydrogen will combine the best of electric and gasoline cars. Instant torque, low pollution and high efficiency along with light weight, quick refueling and a distributed infrastructure - the last is particularly exciting to me - the idea of filling up at home using a HES IV, V or whatever, or perhaps solar cracked hydrogen almost makes me giddy. Furthermore, there will be no hardship for the driver - no new skill sets or learning curves, just get in and drive. No one has ever accused me of being particularly green when it comes to cars, probably because I've never believed sacrifice should be necessary with today's technology. Honda has finally made my beliefs a reality. With the FCX Clarity, being clean and efficient doesn't require a sacrifice, and if Honda can deliver this car at mainstream prices by the next decade as they plan, the world is going to be a lot nicer place. Bravo Honda, Bravo!



[Previous Page]

reader's comments
Click Here to Submit Your Comments

Viewing Threshold (What is this?)

[fancy] [flat] [simple]
Date Thread Starter Thread
11-28-2007 07:52
Total efficiency   (Score: 1, Normal)
Dren
11-28-2007 14:35
Re: Total efficiency   (Score: 1, Normal)
Nick GravesX
11-28-2007 16:29
Re: Total efficiency   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
11-29-2007 08:49
Re: Total efficiency   (Score: 1, Normal)
Dren
11-30-2007 16:58
Re: Total efficiency   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
12-02-2007 14:09
Re: Total efficiency   (Score: 1, Normal)
Nick GravesX
11-29-2007 12:00
Re: Total efficiency   (Score: 1, Normal)
mk23666
11-30-2007 12:12
Re: Total efficiency   (Score: 1, Normal)
Varmint
02-17-2008 16:38
Re: Total efficiency   (Score: 1, Normal)
mk23666
11-28-2007 12:29
Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
6SPDTL
11-28-2007 14:00
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
argod
11-28-2007 14:15
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
2000rebuiltacrd
11-28-2007 14:27
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
Nick GravesX
11-28-2007 14:30
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
2000rebuiltacrd
11-28-2007 14:37
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
Nick GravesX
11-28-2007 15:04
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
Ridge
11-28-2007 14:18
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-28-2007 15:45
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
6SPDTL
11-28-2007 16:22
Soylent Green!!!!   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
11-28-2007 17:27
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
11-28-2007 19:13
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-29-2007 08:54
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
Dren
11-28-2007 20:52
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
HONDA AFVM
11-28-2007 21:02
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
HONDA AFVM
11-28-2007 22:24
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
thepowerofhonda
12-17-2007 07:01
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
Pakos M
12-17-2007 20:18
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
12-18-2007 03:52
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
Pakos M
12-18-2007 11:34
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
12-19-2007 03:23
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
Pakos M
12-19-2007 12:59
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
12-25-2007 00:08
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
RJC RSX
11-28-2007 17:13
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
11-28-2007 15:42
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
iceman6
11-28-2007 16:33
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
CDirect
11-28-2007 17:11
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
JeffX
12-10-2007 15:54
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
danswick
11-28-2007 23:19
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
HONDA AFVM
11-28-2007 16:00
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........Tony, Tony   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
11-28-2007 16:49
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........Tony, Tony   (Score: 1, Normal)
6SPDTL
11-28-2007 17:19
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........Tony, Tony   (Score: 1, Normal)
cksi1372
11-28-2007 17:30
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........Tony, Tony   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
11-28-2007 18:06
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........Tony, Tony   (Score: 1, Normal)
Neilap
11-28-2007 18:26
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........Tony, Tony   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
11-28-2007 19:19
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........Tony, Tony   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
11-28-2007 20:13
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........Tony, Tony   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
11-28-2007 18:04
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........Tony, Tony   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
11-28-2007 17:19
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
11-28-2007 20:12
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
jgalvan1
11-28-2007 22:36
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
argod
11-28-2007 23:18
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
SoR
11-29-2007 02:45
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
argod
11-28-2007 23:31
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
HONDA AFVM
11-28-2007 21:49
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
owequitit
11-28-2007 23:23
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
6SPDTL
11-30-2007 00:41
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
HagerstownHonda
11-29-2007 14:55
Re: Shawn, shawn,shawn........   (Score: 1, Normal)
TMR013
12-11-2007 08:10
Video?   (Score: 1, Normal)
dadliboi
12-18-2007 07:55
Re: Video?   (Score: 1, Normal)
dadliboi
11-28-2007 17:38
Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
dezoris
11-28-2007 22:22
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
Jeffro
11-29-2007 17:59
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
dezoris
11-29-2007 20:03
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-29-2007 21:01
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
Ridge
11-29-2007 21:31
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
dezoris
11-29-2007 21:28
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
dezoris
11-29-2007 21:46
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
CarPhreakD
11-30-2007 12:00
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-30-2007 12:04
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
12-02-2007 14:02
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
Nick GravesX
12-02-2007 15:39
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-28-2007 23:36
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
12-03-2007 00:33
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
6SPDTL
12-03-2007 13:13
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
R-Z
12-04-2007 11:34
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
6SPDTL
12-05-2007 22:51
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
dootndo2
12-11-2007 22:14
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
6SPDTL
12-13-2007 10:06
Re: Exhaust problem   (Score: 1, Normal)
Smoke_Jaguar4
12-10-2007 15:49
Opinions??   (Score: 1, Normal)
danswick
12-10-2007 20:52
Re: Opinions??   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-28-2007 23:00
Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
argod
11-28-2007 23:22
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
SoR
11-29-2007 02:03
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
argod
11-29-2007 16:04
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
SoR
11-28-2007 23:34
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-29-2007 01:21
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
DCR
11-29-2007 05:02
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
Nick GravesX
11-29-2007 11:57
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
mk23666
11-29-2007 02:33
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
argod
11-29-2007 09:19
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
Dren
11-29-2007 12:00
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-29-2007 16:16
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
11-30-2007 18:16
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
HJV1
11-30-2007 01:41
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
argod
11-30-2007 11:23
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
Nick GravesX
11-30-2007 16:39
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
12-01-2007 18:33
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
12-02-2007 13:59
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
Nick GravesX
12-02-2007 19:52
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
12-04-2007 15:03
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
revdwight
12-06-2007 03:52
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
Silver2k2Si
12-06-2007 11:02
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
12-10-2007 16:56
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
danswick
12-10-2007 20:47
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
12-01-2007 18:09
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
12-01-2007 18:25
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
11-29-2007 16:46
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
HJV1
11-29-2007 16:38
Re: Debunk This   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
11-28-2007 05:52
Thank you for honesty that CO2 is not driving global warming   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
11-28-2007 10:12
Re: If you don't care about CO2, forget H2, drive CTL !   (Score: 1, Normal)
danielgr
11-28-2007 13:44
Re: If you don't care about CO2, forget H2, drive CTL !   (Score: 1, Normal)
argod
11-28-2007 17:04
Re: If you don't care about CO2, forget H2, drive CTL !   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
12-10-2007 16:52
Re: If you don't care about CO2, forget H2, drive CTL !   (Score: 1, Normal)
danswick
11-28-2007 12:06
Re: Thank you for honesty that CO2 is not driving global warming   (Score: 1, Normal)
zapata
11-28-2007 12:30
Re: Thank you for honesty that CO2 is not driving global warming   (Score: 1, Normal)
JV03h
11-28-2007 12:44
Re: Thank you for honesty that CO2 is not driving global warming   (Score: 1, Normal)
swinn
11-28-2007 13:49
Re: Thank you for honesty that CO2 is not driving global warming   (Score: 1, Normal)
argod
11-28-2007 14:49
Re: Thank you for honesty that CO2 is not driving global warming   (Score: 1, Normal)
JV03h
11-28-2007 16:02
Message below viewing threshold View   (Score: 0, Netiquette Foul)
2000rebuiltacrd
11-29-2007 07:11
Message below viewing threshold View   (Score: 0, Normal)
JV03h
12-10-2007 16:02
Re: Thank you for honesty that CO2 is not driving global warming   (Score: 1, Normal)
danswick
12-08-2007 18:27
weight?   (Score: 1, Normal)
peetah
12-08-2007 18:56
Re: weight?   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-28-2007 18:08
I remember the Hindenburg   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
11-29-2007 18:07
Re: I remember the Hindenburg   (Score: 1, Normal)
dezoris
11-30-2007 11:27
Re: I remember the Hindenburg   (Score: 1, Normal)
Nick GravesX
12-03-2007 13:17
Re: I remember the Hindenburg   (Score: 1, Normal)
R-Z
12-03-2007 18:50
Re: I remember the Hindenburg   (Score: 1, Normal)
chotzo
11-29-2007 10:12
Question Shawn???   (Score: 1, Normal)
HONDA AFVM
11-30-2007 07:13
Re: Question Shawn???   (Score: 1, Normal)
Terencemunro
11-30-2007 20:45
Re: Question Shawn???   (Score: 1, Normal)
HONDA AFVM
12-02-2007 01:09
Re: Question Shawn???   (Score: 1, Normal)
Wizard
12-02-2007 18:25
Re: Question Shawn???   (Score: 1, Normal)
HONDA AFVM
11-28-2007 17:35
Re-Fueling   (Score: 1, Normal)
dezoris
11-28-2007 18:21
Re: Re-Fueling   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
12-01-2007 21:11
Re: Re-Fueling   (Score: 1, Normal)
nickel
11-30-2007 09:07
Penalty?   (Score: 1, Normal)
thepowerofhonda
11-28-2007 12:27
Li-Ion Batteries   (Score: 1, Normal)
snickers_60177
11-29-2007 18:12
Re: Li-Ion Batteries   (Score: 1, Normal)
dezoris
11-28-2007 14:14
Whats with global warming!?   (Score: 1, Normal)
2000rebuiltacrd
11-28-2007 17:41
Re: Whats with global warming!?   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
11-28-2007 21:31
Re: Whats with global warming!?   (Score: 1, Normal)
owequitit
11-29-2007 16:46
Re: Whats with global warming!?   (Score: 1, Normal)
MalcolmR
11-28-2007 16:46
Design   (Score: 1, Normal)
Potenza
11-28-2007 23:39
Re: Design   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-28-2007 14:19
Clarity marketing   (Score: 1, Normal)
retired
11-28-2007 14:45
Re: Clarity marketing   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-28-2007 16:03
Re: Clarity marketing -Opulance.   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
11-28-2007 16:47
Re: Clarity marketing -Opulance.   (Score: 1, Normal)
retired
11-28-2007 18:07
Re: Clarity marketing -Opulance.   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
11-28-2007 19:21
Re: Clarity marketing -Opulance.   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-28-2007 20:01
Re: Clarity marketing -Opulance.   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
11-28-2007 20:09
Re: Clarity marketing -Opulance.   (Score: 1, Normal)
notyper
11-28-2007 20:14
Re: Clarity marketing -Opulance.   (Score: 1, Normal)
TonyEX
11-28-2007 13:09
Thanks for the most detailed write-up I've read on the FCX   (Score: 1, Normal)
danielgr
11-28-2007 15:48
Re: Thanks for the most detailed write-up I've read on the FCX   (Score: 1, Normal)
6SPDTL
11-28-2007 17:54
Re: Thanks for the most detailed write-up I've read on the FCX   (Score: 1, Normal)
dadliboi
11-28-2007 18:51
Re: Thanks for the most detailed write-up I've read on the FCX   (Score: 1, Normal)
musicmanvin
11-28-2007 12:40
Like the color   (Score: 1, Normal)
SonyFever
Jump to:
View this profile on Instagram

TEMPLE OF VTEC (@temple_of_vtec) • Instagram photos and videos

First Drive: 2023 Acura Integra - Rebirth of an Icon?
Read Article....................
2023 Acura Integra PR Photo Gallery
Read Article....................
2022 Acura MDX Specs and Features
Read Article....................
2022 Honda Civic Design Story, a video by Honda
Read Article....................
Photo Gallery: 2021 Acura TLX Advance
Read Article....................
Photo Gallery: 2021 Acura TLX A-Spec
Read Article....................
Contact TOV | Submit Your Article | Submit Your Link | Advertise | TOV Shop | Events | Our Sponsors | TOV Archives
Copyright © 2023 Velocitech Inc. All information contained herein remains the property of Velocitech Inc.
The Temple of VTEC is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. TOV Policies and Guidelines - Credits - Privacy Policy
30