[home][rumors and news][model release matrix][dealer network][desktop calendar][exhaust notes][tov forums][links][search][sponsors][garage][login]

Tire Rack Upgrade Garage
 Search for a Dealer:
 Canadian Flag US Flag
 Honda Acura
 ZIP  
Honda to Participate in the FIA Formula One World Championship
More.......................
Sources: Announcement of Honda's F1 Return is Imminent
More.......................
NSX Project Update, Conference Call Notes
More.......................
Acura NSX Production Site Selected in Ohio
More.......................
2014 Acura ILX Luxury Sports Sedan Arrives With Host of New Standard Features...
More.......................
Spring Cleaning: What's in store for model year 2014? Part I - Acura
More.......................
Production of 2014 Acura MDX Begins in Alabama
More.......................
Honda April Sales Up on CR-V Monthly Sales Record; All-New RLX Flagship Sedan Bolsters Acura Sales
More.......................
Accord --> Re: 2013 Accord front license plate bracket(holes in front bumper)
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Announcements from HPD? What about?
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: 2014 Silverado mileage
Join Discussion......
ILX --> Re: 1st Generation ILX Reviews
Join Discussion......
CR-V --> Re: New 2014 Subaru Forester is Consumer Report's top-scoring small SUV
Join Discussion......
NSX --> Re: NSX Testing
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: Volvo plugin wagon sells better than expected...
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Mclaren Honda Collaboration
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Rd. 4 - MotoGP LeMans ***SPOILER***
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> LeMans - 2013
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: start-stop technology in Honda?
Join Discussion......
Civic --> Re: Nurburgring lap times
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: My Thoughts On The NSX
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: NSX Little Questions Answered Tomorrow
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: 2014 ILX on Acura's website (U.S)
Join Discussion......
TOV Video: 2014 Acura MDX Walkaround at 2013 NYIAS
Read Article....................
TOV Photo Gallery: 2014 Acura MDX
Read Article....................
2014 Acura MDX PR Photo Gallery
Read Article....................
TOV Dyno Test: 2013 Accord EX 6MT
Read Article....................
TOV Video: 2014 RLX on an autocross run
Read Article....................
TOV Dyno Test: 2013 Accord V6 EX-L 6MT Coupe
Read Article....................



[fancy] [flat] [simple]
TOV Forums > Optimizing Fuel Economy > > Re: Accord 6-6 at 90k...........................

Go to:

Viewing Threshold (What is this?)

Thread Page - [1]
Author
  Post New Thread
ezshift5
Profile for ezshift5
Accord 6-6 at 90k...........................    (Score: 1, Normal) 10-03-2010 16:31
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Fuel economy notes for the last month just prior to rolling over 90,000 miles. Not much different from the first fill - - - 5 years ago.

2027.7 miles/70.938 gallons. 28.6 MPG. Range: 23.6 - 30.8. Median: somewhere between 29.5 and 26.8. Mode: 26.5.

Eight fillups: 30.83/30.04/29.93/29.54/26.83/26.41/26.07/23.6

Still using OEM pads at 90k. No complaints, ez.....................
owequitit
Profile for owequitit
Re: Accord 6-6 at 90k...........................    (Score: 1, Normal) 10-03-2010 23:49
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Very nice. I am still disappointed with VCM. Our 2009 sedan keeps getting marginally better, but it still can't touch the 06 at all, and it was much more responsive and visceral.

I just got 33MPG out of my Si for the last two tanks, and am pretty happy about that, but I just don't like some of the MPG technology Honda has implemented. I think owners would be happier with the non VCM 6 (even if detuned) and a 6AT.
danielgr
Profile for danielgr
Re: Accord 6-6 at 90k...........................    (Score: 1, Normal) 10-04-2010 05:35
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
ezshift5 wrote:
Fuel economy notes for the last month just prior to rolling over 90,000 miles. Not much different from the first fill - - - 5 years ago.

2027.7 miles/70.938 gallons. 28.6 MPG. Range: 23.6 - 30.8. Median: somewhere between 29.5 and 26.8. Mode: 26.5.

Eight fillups: 30.83/30.04/29.93/29.54/26.83/26.41/26.07/23.6

Still using OEM pads at 90k. No complaints, ez.....................

Thanks for sharing !
It seems that you are tracking your FE pretty closely, why not participating in TOV's real world FE database so that we can keep track of it and see how it compares with other cars ? [we still have no Accord in there :) ]
danielgr
Profile for danielgr
Re: Accord 6-6 at 90k...........................    (Score: 1, Normal) 10-04-2010 05:44
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
owequitit wrote:
Very nice. I am still disappointed with VCM. Our 2009 sedan keeps getting marginally better, but it still can't touch the 06 at all, and it was much more responsive and visceral.

I just got 33MPG out of my Si for the last two tanks, and am pretty happy about that, but I just don't like some of the MPG technology Honda has implemented. I think owners would be happier with the non VCM 6 (even if detuned) and a 6AT.

Well, to be honest you haven't try putting your old J30 on your new considerably bigger and heavier Accord to see how responsive it would be and how good FE would it get...

Given the fact that even the VCM J35 makes more power through the whole rev-band than the J30 did (the difference is small at low revs, increases considerably at higher revs), it was likely to feel even slower and less responsive. Same would happen with your stellar FE, with the old engine having to work harder to move your new car, and therefore using more gas (also in the highway thanks to the larger front area and any up-downhill you may experience).

Besides, to get VCM engines FE benefit you have to drive your car at low loads (i.e. "slow" and "smooth"). Maybe you aren't really doing that (because maybe you don't want to, and you are in your perfect right to do it, just saying that's normal that you don't get better FE in such case); that's up to the user to decide.

Finally, your J30 wasn't rated P-ZEV, which may have also something to do with it.

In the end though, I have the feeling you dislike more the weight and bulkiness of your new car than its engine.
owequitit
Profile for owequitit
Re: Accord 6-6 at 90k...........................    (Score: 1, Normal) 10-04-2010 14:29
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
danielgr wrote:
owequitit wrote:
Very nice. I am still disappointed with VCM. Our 2009 sedan keeps getting marginally better, but it still can't touch the 06 at all, and it was much more responsive and visceral.

I just got 33MPG out of my Si for the last two tanks, and am pretty happy about that, but I just don't like some of the MPG technology Honda has implemented. I think owners would be happier with the non VCM 6 (even if detuned) and a 6AT.

Well, to be honest you haven't try putting your old J30 on your new considerably bigger and heavier Accord to see how responsive it would be and how good FE would it get...

Given the fact that even the VCM J35 makes more power through the whole rev-band than the J30 did (the difference is small at low revs, increases considerably at higher revs), it was likely to feel even slower and less responsive. Same would happen with your stellar FE, with the old engine having to work harder to move your new car, and therefore using more gas (also in the highway thanks to the larger front area and any up-downhill you may experience).

Besides, to get VCM engines FE benefit you have to drive your car at low loads (i.e. "slow" and "smooth"). Maybe you aren't really doing that (because maybe you don't want to, and you are in your perfect right to do it, just saying that's normal that you don't get better FE in such case); that's up to the user to decide.

Finally, your J30 wasn't rated P-ZEV, which may have also something to do with it.

In the end though, I have the feeling you dislike more the weight and bulkiness of your new car than its engine.



B.S. B.S. and more B.S. I have looked at the dyno graphs. I hardly call about a 10-20HP difference all that significant, since it works out to less than 10%.

Also, the VCM engine is no stronger in the bottom end, and considering the relatively large displacement gain, and the MPG drop, it is far from worth it. Then you add in the lazy PCM programming, and it is even more lethargic.

Truth be told, the 09 pulls ever so slightly better than the 06 at speeds approaching 90MPH, but it is not significant enough to worry about. We are talking inches.

More importantly, we were ROUTINELY getting 26-27MPG city out of the 2006, whereas 21MPG out of the 09 in the EXACT same conditions is a chore. Sorry, but 150lbs wouldn't account for that much of a difference in MPG. We also ROUTINELY ran 33-36MPG on the highway, whereas the 09 is lucky to get 25-26 under the EXACT same conditions.

As for the difference in emmissions, I am pretty sure the real world results would be significantly similar due to the decrease gas usage (even if the amount of pollutant per gallon was higher), and I am not totally certain our 2009 is actually P-ZEV. If it is, I bet it is largely a paper excercise like EPA ratings.

Sorry Daniel, but I know a thing or two about engines, and the VCM unit sucks comparatively speaking. Especially when the non-VCM units are far more powerful and responsive and are also returning significantly better MPG numbers.
 
Thread Page - [1]
Go to:
Contact TOV | Submit Your Article | Submit Your Link | Advertise | TOV Shop | Events | Our Sponsors | TOV Archives
Copyright © 2012 Velocitech Inc. All information contained herein remains the property of Velocitech Inc.
The Temple of VTEC is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. TOV Policies and Guidelines - Credits - Privacy Policy