Re: Most Credible Climate Skeptic Not So Credible After All
(Score: 1, Normal)
Nick Graves wrote: 2005?
Interestingly, all those challenges/doubts are dismissed by the GW lobby as "already answered" or "not correct" and the repudiations are never actually given.
It will be interesting to see whether the great unwashed are so religiously indoctrinated, that hybrids and eco-stuff really DO drive the next K-wave cycle, or whether it all implodes as another great swindle.
I suspect that due to environmental pressures from Chinese/Indian competition for resources, it will continue alongside the other superstitions which beleaguere society.
Ah... Americans... (not talking to you Nick) you should be carefull, the day you may acknowledge it you may be awfully lagging behind the Japanese, the Europeans, and even the Chinese. That day you may end up buying their technology, the one that was developped fueled by their people's earlier believe ... And even if it doesn't come, with resources being more and more scarce as the 6billion people in this planet improve their living conditions little by little, most efficient societies will end up ahead, like it or not. The race of the future won't be about the rapidity of exploiting unlimited resources, but about the efficiency at which limited ones are handled.
Don't you see that you are being deceived by the economic interests of a few guys... You should definitelly wake up and stop listening to those "skeptics", with or without climate change, it could only help you in the future...
Good luck !
PS: The good thing is that I'm still young enough to be here watching when that day finally comes...