[home][rumors and news][model release matrix][dealer network][desktop calendar][exhaust notes][tov forums][links][search][sponsors][garage][login]

Tire Rack Upgrade Garage
 Search for a Dealer:
 Canadian Flag US Flag
 Honda Acura
 ZIP  
Honda to Participate in the FIA Formula One World Championship
More.......................
Sources: Announcement of Honda's F1 Return is Imminent
More.......................
NSX Project Update, Conference Call Notes
More.......................
Acura NSX Production Site Selected in Ohio
More.......................
2014 Acura ILX Luxury Sports Sedan Arrives With Host of New Standard Features...
More.......................
Spring Cleaning: What's in store for model year 2014? Part I - Acura
More.......................
Production of 2014 Acura MDX Begins in Alabama
More.......................
Honda April Sales Up on CR-V Monthly Sales Record; All-New RLX Flagship Sedan Bolsters Acura Sales
More.......................
Today's Reading Links --> Volvo plugin wagon sells better than expected...
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Clear pics of BMW 2 series, entry luxury segment more crowded
Join Discussion......
Civic --> Re: 06 Civic Si - Paint Job And Steering
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Sporty cars don't sell - oh yeah?
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Indy500
Join Discussion......
Civic --> Re: Nurburgring lap times
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Rd. 4 - MotoGP LeMans ***SPOILER***
Join Discussion......
ILX --> Re: Track footage
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: 2014 ILX on Acura's website (U.S)
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: NSX Little Questions Answered Tomorrow
Join Discussion......
CR-V --> Re: CR-V sells well, so what's next?
Join Discussion......
Optimizing Fuel Economy --> Re: TOV users Real World FE database - How to
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Brief Honda F1 History
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: What to get next?
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: 50 Years JDM Honda automobile timeline on Honda Japan site
Join Discussion......
TOV Video: 2014 Acura MDX Walkaround at 2013 NYIAS
Read Article....................
TOV Photo Gallery: 2014 Acura MDX
Read Article....................
2014 Acura MDX PR Photo Gallery
Read Article....................
TOV Dyno Test: 2013 Accord EX 6MT
Read Article....................
TOV Video: 2014 RLX on an autocross run
Read Article....................
TOV Dyno Test: 2013 Accord V6 EX-L 6MT Coupe
Read Article....................

[fancy] [flat] [simple]
  TOV Articles > Short Take - 2004 Acura RL > > Re: RL vs. 1st gen 3.2TL

Viewing Threshold (What is this?)

Thread Page - [1]
Author
    
TonyEX
Profile for TonyEX
RL vs. 1st gen 3.2TL [View Article]    (Score: 1, Normal) 05-26-2004 10:11
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
I remember sitting down in an RL back in 98. We had a 97 3.2TL then. The TL was far, FAR more luxurious than the RL. A bit smaller, but the TL was a far nicer place to be.

Both have the old V6 motors and AT4's. The TL has a simple gate that allows you to go from 4th to 3rd and back easily. The motor is also lazy but very torquey. It's also throaty and fun to listen to.

All in all.... Acura did languish in the mid 90s with bone headed model decisions. The Integra bypassed a Civic generation, the first gen TL was not as good as the Vigor (sorry KenB), the first CL was a complete disappointment (the 2.2 was a joke, the 3.0's transmission was a royal pain in the ass) and the RL was meant for the Buick crowd.

I believe that today we're seeing the result of the marketing reorganization that AHM did on Acura in the late 90s. The new cars are much, MUCH improved. But more importantly they show a purpose and a family trait toward sportiness. No longer a poor man's BMW, but indeed a better BMW in many ways.

The old "rl" is dead, thank God. Long live the new "RL".
JeffX
Profile for JeffX
Re: RL vs. 1st gen 3.2TL [View Article]    (Score: 1, Normal) 05-26-2004 11:35
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
My mother had a '97 3.2 TL Premium. I have to say that while it wasn't really an inspiring car overall, it was one of the last Acuras that had a truly "elegant" interior. The exterior was not exactly striking but it carried a "premium" look and feel. The only real drawback was the frameless windows.

When the new models came out in '99 the interior was a bit more modern, but I (and particularly my mother) was put off by the generic styling of the exterior and the visibly cost-reduced interior.

Acura's interiors are quite stylish now but they still smack a bit too much of cost reduction. They're already getting better than their recent "low point" (thank god they stopped using that silk screened gold labeling all over the place! - that was one thing they picked up from Lexus that I wish they never had!) but I still think they're trying too hard to engineer to a price point.

Acura seems to lack a bit of confidence that they can compete in the market without out-gizmoing the competitors and undercutting their price at the same time. Lower prices and more features are great, but if I have to spend an extra grand or two on a $35+k car to get one that's finished and trimmed to world class standards (think high-line Audi/BMW), then I think it's well worth it.

TonyE wrote:
I remember sitting down in an RL back in 98. We had a 97 3.2TL then. The TL was far, FAR more luxurious than the RL. A bit smaller, but the TL was a far nicer place to be.

Both have the old V6 motors and AT4's. The TL has a simple gate that allows you to go from 4th to 3rd and back easily. The motor is also lazy but very torquey. It's also throaty and fun to listen to.

All in all.... Acura did languish in the mid 90s with bone headed model decisions. The Integra bypassed a Civic generation, the first gen TL was not as good as the Vigor (sorry KenB), the first CL was a complete disappointment (the 2.2 was a joke, the 3.0's transmission was a royal pain in the ass) and the RL was meant for the Buick crowd.

I believe that today we're seeing the result of the marketing reorganization that AHM did on Acura in the late 90s. The new cars are much, MUCH improved. But more importantly they show a purpose and a family trait toward sportiness. No longer a poor man's BMW, but indeed a better BMW in many ways.

The old "rl" is dead, thank God. Long live the new "RL".




KenB
Profile for KenB
Re: RL vs. 1st gen 3.2TL [View Article]    (Score: 1, Normal) 05-26-2004 14:57
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
I have to agree. The 1st gen TL has a better interior than the 2nd, hardly any black plastic and a lot of plood and better layout. My father owns an '03 TL and commented on how nice my '97 is. He likes his engine/transmission better though ;-)

As for the frameless windows, they're evil and thank god I know how to disassemble my doors and redo those things, they're a pain and downright dangerous for people not used to them.

The suspension while biased for a smooth ride, is far more "sporty" than the RL, even the '02 - '04 RL. The steering wheel has EXCELLENT feedback, something that is a must for me, I think it is one of the last Acuras/Hondas to offer a proper amount of roadfeel.
TonyEX
Profile for TonyEX
Re: RL vs. 1st gen 3.2TL [View Article]    (Score: 1, Normal) 05-26-2004 16:04
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Our green 99 TL and blue 01 CL had the cream colored interior with the blonde "wood". We added the "wood" aplique over the dash and console plus the real wood shifter knob. The difference that it made to the interior is hard to describe.. it turned a sea of plastic into a very nice and warm cabin. So equipped, the interiors of our green 97 and 99 TLs weren't that different (both had cream interiors).

But then, the God Almighty grey "wood" in the Type Ss really turned me off. It was one of the main reasons why we went with the base 01 CL instead -I kid you not. I just couldn't stomach the look. Power or not.

Also, you must remember that the 2nd gen TL was about $7K less than the first. While at the same time was far larger inside, far more nimble and introduced a sleek look, vs. the formal look of the 1st gen. So they had to cut cost somewhere.

But the exterior of the 2nd gen was very nice, IMHO... the front fenders wrapped tucked nicely into the front and the rear doors were long with good access to the back seat (this is where I think the TL is better than the TSX, not in lower cushion depth but in access) The 2nd gen might have been a tad generic, but in a well balanced sort of way.

Oh.. hey? I liked the frame less windows.. that was a design cue takend directly from the Vigor. I never had any problem with them, did you? The second generation Integra sedan also had them.

Perhaps AHM ought to reintroduce the "Premium" or "GS" trim level for Acura.

Jeff wrote:
My mother had a '97 3.2 TL Premium. I have to say that while it wasn't really an inspiring car overall, it was one of the last Acuras that had a truly "elegant" interior. The exterior was not exactly striking but it carried a "premium" look and feel. The only real drawback was the frameless windows.

When the new models came out in '99 the interior was a bit more modern, but I (and particularly my mother) was put off by the generic styling of the exterior and the visibly cost-reduced interior.

Acura's interiors are quite stylish now but they still smack a bit too much of cost reduction. They're already getting better than their recent "low point" (thank god they stopped using that silk screened gold labeling all over the place! - that was one thing they picked up from Lexus that I wish they never had!) but I still think they're trying too hard to engineer to a price point.

Acura seems to lack a bit of confidence that they can compete in the market without out-gizmoing the competitors and undercutting their price at the same time. Lower prices and more features are great, but if I have to spend an extra grand or two on a $35+k car to get one that's finished and trimmed to world class standards (think high-line Audi/BMW), then I think it's well worth it.




dodole
Profile for dodole
Re: RL vs. 1st gen 3.2TL [View Article]    (Score: 1, Normal) 05-28-2004 14:05
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
TonyE wrote:
Our green 99 TL and blue 01 CL had the cream colored interior with the blonde "wood". We added the "wood" aplique over the dash and console plus the real wood shifter knob. The difference that it made to the interior is hard to describe.. it turned a sea of plastic into a very nice and warm cabin. So equipped, the interiors of our green 97 and 99 TLs weren't that different (both had cream interiors).

But then, the God Almighty grey "wood" in the Type Ss really turned me off. It was one of the main reasons why we went with the base 01 CL instead -I kid you not. I just couldn't stomach the look. Power or not.

Also, you must remember that the 2nd gen TL was about $7K less than the first. While at the same time was far larger inside, far more nimble and introduced a sleek look, vs. the formal look of the 1st gen. So they had to cut cost somewhere.

But the exterior of the 2nd gen was very nice, IMHO... the front fenders wrapped tucked nicely into the front and the rear doors were long with good access to the back seat (this is where I think the TL is better than the TSX, not in lower cushion depth but in access) The 2nd gen might have been a tad generic, but in a well balanced sort of way.

Oh.. hey? I liked the frame less windows.. that was a design cue takend directly from the Vigor. I never had any problem with them, did you? The second generation Integra sedan also had them.

Perhaps AHM ought to reintroduce the "Premium" or "GS" trim level for Acura.

Jeff wrote:
My mother had a '97 3.2 TL Premium. I have to say that while it wasn't really an inspiring car overall, it was one of the last Acuras that had a truly "elegant" interior. The exterior was not exactly striking but it carried a "premium" look and feel. The only real drawback was the frameless windows.

When the new models came out in '99 the interior was a bit more modern, but I (and particularly my mother) was put off by the generic styling of the exterior and the visibly cost-reduced interior.

Acura's interiors are quite stylish now but they still smack a bit too much of cost reduction. They're already getting better than their recent "low point" (thank god they stopped using that silk screened gold labeling all over the place! - that was one thing they picked up from Lexus that I wish they never had!) but I still think they're trying too hard to engineer to a price point.

Acura seems to lack a bit of confidence that they can compete in the market without out-gizmoing the competitors and undercutting their price at the same time. Lower prices and more features are great, but if I have to spend an extra grand or two on a $35+k car to get one that's finished and trimmed to world class standards (think high-line Audi/BMW), then I think it's well worth it.







GS.. yes... GS... i still love my 1994 Legend GS.. just dont know that is my next replacement. I drove accords... prelude and now legend.. maybe i ll might try to get a used NSX once i graduate.
 
Thread Page - [1]
Contact TOV | Submit Your Article | Submit Your Link | Advertise | TOV Shop | Events | Our Sponsors | TOV Archives
Copyright © 2012 Velocitech Inc. All information contained herein remains the property of Velocitech Inc.
The Temple of VTEC is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. TOV Policies and Guidelines - Credits - Privacy Policy