|
|
|
|
 |
Hondarulez
 |
|
|
Definitely, but the point is that some calculations have to be made and we can't simply conclude larger rim = slower. That's only true in most cases, but not all.
|
JP
 |
|
Hondarulez wrote:
WingZ wrote:
Wow four cylinder manual is a sec slower but same mpg.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2013-honda-accord-four-cylinder-manual-test-review
|
Damn that's fast...as expected (I said before that it should be as fast as TSX I4 6MT)..they must be having a lot of fun with it to be getting that mpg! lol!
Is this the fastest NA I4 mid-size sedan in its class? Heck, it's about as fast as Fusion 2.0 Ecoboost AWD!
|
I don't buy that crap history of 189hp, that little monster makes 220-230hp on the crankshaft...
|
Hondarulez
 |
|
|
Tsx i4 6mt is as fast and according to shawn's dyno, it's good for 180whp if I remember correctly.
|
Restless
 |
|
Hondarulez wrote:
Definitely, but the point is that some calculations have to be made and we can't simply conclude larger rim = slower. That's only true in most cases, but not all.
|
There was a comparison, afaik on insideline, ~ year ago.
They had run a Golf with different tires/rims, from 15" to 20"
Generally 1" bigger rims were penalizing 0-100km/h times with 0.1sec
|
Hondarulez
 |
|
Yes, like I said, in general, larger rim = more weight and more inertia.
However, if the larger rim is actually lighter, the effect might not be that much. I believe this discussion was started when someone mentioned the 328i M-sport is slower because of larger rims. I'd imagine BMW uses nicer (i.e. lighter rims) to begin with (considering how much a BMW and the M-package cost). Its 18" or 19" rims may even be lighter than Honda's 17" ones. For my car, my 18" Volks are quite a bit lighter than my stock 17" Enkei rims.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Thread Page - 1 [2] |
|  |
|