danielgr
 |
|
All of the existing 9 directors show their scores increase in 2012 general shareholders meeting, with the average topping 95% approval rate, up nearly 2% vs. 2011.
Here is the original Honda PR, and here is a table summarizing the 2011_vs_2012 change.
|
98EX4cyl
 |
|
Let's hope the 2013 Accord is as good as we hope or those approval ratings are going to suffer.
IMO the Civics meak reception may have been balanced out by the overwhelmingly positive press garned by the NSX. Likewise the positive RDX reaction and sales could balance out the ILX.
Personally having just read about the ZDX MMC decision, I would deduct 5% from each of them. Just admit it was a bad decision from the start and move on.
|
330R
 |
|
|
Fukui has a higher approval rating than Ito.
|
P54
 |
|
330R wrote:
Fukui has a higher approval rating than Ito.
|
7 others are higher than Fukui. Go figure.
BTW Obama only has about 47% approval rating. And he is the President of a nation. Ito seems to do very well in comparison to him, don't you think?
|
danielgr
 |
|
330R wrote:
Fukui has a higher approval rating than Ito.
|
Personally I don't find surprising that the CEO gets fewer affirmative votes than other directors, if only because of constant exposure and ultimate responsibility. I don't think many shareholders know much about Fukui on his current pre-retirement role, whereas Ito is the one constantly shown behind the wheel.
So I'm not sure of what were you trying to read from that comparison but I don't think you are doing it right...
Anyway, what is clear is that:
• shareholders are happy with how Honda dealed with past year, as shown by improved ratings of all directors
• Overall, Honda's board of directors enjoys massive support from those that own the company
|
330R
 |
|
danielgr wrote:
So I'm not sure of what were you trying to read from that comparison |
Nothing at all. :) Really
|
330R
 |
|
P54 wrote:
7 others are higher than Fukui. Go figure. |
You'll always have a 0% approval rating from me.
|
|
|
| |