[home][rumors and news][model release matrix][dealer network][desktop calendar][exhaust notes][tov forums][links][search][sponsors][garage][login]

Tire Rack Upgrade Garage
 Search for a Dealer:
 Canadian Flag US Flag
 Honda Acura
 ZIP  
Honda to Participate in the FIA Formula One World Championship
More.......................
Sources: Announcement of Honda's F1 Return is Imminent
More.......................
NSX Project Update, Conference Call Notes
More.......................
Acura NSX Production Site Selected in Ohio
More.......................
2014 Acura ILX Luxury Sports Sedan Arrives With Host of New Standard Features...
More.......................
Spring Cleaning: What's in store for model year 2014? Part I - Acura
More.......................
Production of 2014 Acura MDX Begins in Alabama
More.......................
Honda April Sales Up on CR-V Monthly Sales Record; All-New RLX Flagship Sedan Bolsters Acura Sales
More.......................
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Announcements from HPD? What about?
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: start-stop technology in Honda?
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: My Thoughts On The NSX
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: 2014 ILX on Acura's website (U.S)
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: 2014 Silverado mileage
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Rd. 4 - MotoGP LeMans ***SPOILER***
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Mclaren Honda Collaboration
Join Discussion......
Civic --> Re: Nurburgring lap times
Join Discussion......
CR-V --> Re: New 2014 Subaru Forester is Consumer Report's top-scoring small SUV
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: NSX Little Questions Answered Tomorrow
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Clear pics of BMW 2 series, entry luxury segment more crowded
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Australian V8 Supercars - Whither Honda?
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: Volvo plugin wagon sells better than expected...
Join Discussion......
ILX --> Re: Track footage
Join Discussion......
Optimizing Fuel Economy --> Re: TOV users Real World FE database - How to
Join Discussion......
TOV Video: 2014 Acura MDX Walkaround at 2013 NYIAS
Read Article....................
TOV Photo Gallery: 2014 Acura MDX
Read Article....................
2014 Acura MDX PR Photo Gallery
Read Article....................
TOV Dyno Test: 2013 Accord EX 6MT
Read Article....................
TOV Video: 2014 RLX on an autocross run
Read Article....................
TOV Dyno Test: 2013 Accord V6 EX-L 6MT Coupe
Read Article....................

[fancy] [flat] [simple]
  TOV News > American Honda Reports May Auto Sales > > Re: Musings on the new RDX

Viewing Threshold (What is this?)

Thread Page - [1] 2
Author
    
notyper
Profile for notyper
Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-01-2012 18:38
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
I am pleased to see how well the new RDX is doing. And I think it offers some instructive lessons as to what Honda and Acura should be focusing on going forward.

Remember that when the RDX was first launched, Jeff (and others) on these forums brought up two things. First, that the market for these compact luxo-utes really wasn't there yet and second, that for this sort of market, a J-series V6 would have been a better choice.

Now, personally, I loved the concept of a turbo SH-AWD powertrain. While I agree that it isn't the best choice for a CUV (if for no other reason than sport is not the primary purchase driver in this class), I had high hopes that Honda would refine and transfer this powertrain to some cars (TSX for example).

Of course, that didn't happen, and while the RDX sold decently and developed a loyal following, it wasn't the sort of success that Honda wanted or needed. So someone at Honda/Acura clearly looked at the market and made the appropriate changes and look where it got them. It's still early, but I'm betting the RDX will be to the CUV market as the MDX is to the SUV segment - the smart, high value, moderate luxury entry that offers enough sport to entertain, but enough of everything else to attract female and older buyers. The sweet spot if you will.

Which brings me to the real point of my post which is - The FMC RDX is a perfect example of making the appropriate choices and compromises for the class/target market. Old RDX = unique engine, expensive SH-AWD. New RDX = generic Honda V6 and cheaper RT4WD setup. Percentage of buyers who will view this negatively (or even notice in the case of the AWD change)? About 2% in my estimation.

This was a good use of existing corporate materials and platforms. It makes sense and it will pay off for Honda.

By the same token, you do not want to go this way with sports type or high end luxury models. You need bespoke powertrain options, unique looks, manual transmissions, etc. These offerings need to be special, and make the owner feel special. They are not profit centers, they are brand builders and halo vehicles. Not everything has to be unique, but you have to offer enough difference to make the offering stand out. If the looks are going to be generic to the model, you had better make sure the powertrain and performance stand out. If you give it unique looks/sheetmetal, then consumers will accept a carryover powertrain more readily. But if you try and add some gingerbread in the looks department and throw in a generic corporate powerplant, buyers aren't going to be happy. Parts-bin cars are fine, as long as people don't feel like, or are not reminded that they are driving one.

Maybe the RDX is a sign of hope at Honda. I'm pessimistic, but time will tell.

SC
TonyEX
Profile for TonyEX
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-01-2012 19:34
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
notyper wrote:
I am pleased to see how well the new RDX is doing. And I think it offers some instructive lessons as to what Honda and Acura should be focusing on going forward.

Remember that when the RDX was first launched, Jeff (and others) on these forums brought up two things. First, that the market for these compact luxo-utes really wasn't there yet and second, that for this sort of market, a J-series V6 would have been a better choice.

Now, personally, I loved the concept of a turbo SH-AWD powertrain. While I agree that it isn't the best choice for a CUV (if for no other reason than sport is not the primary purchase driver in this class), I had high hopes that Honda would refine and transfer this powertrain to some cars (TSX for example).

Of course, that didn't happen, and while the RDX sold decently and developed a loyal following, it wasn't the sort of success that Honda wanted or needed. So someone at Honda/Acura clearly looked at the market and made the appropriate changes and look where it got them. It's still early, but I'm betting the RDX will be to the CUV market as the MDX is to the SUV segment - the smart, high value, moderate luxury entry that offers enough sport to entertain, but enough of everything else to attract female and older buyers. The sweet spot if you will.

Which brings me to the real point of my post which is - The FMC RDX is a perfect example of making the appropriate choices and compromises for the class/target market. Old RDX = unique engine, expensive SH-AWD. New RDX = generic Honda V6 and cheaper RT4WD setup. Percentage of buyers who will view this negatively (or even notice in the case of the AWD change)? About 2% in my estimation.

This was a good use of existing corporate materials and platforms. It makes sense and it will pay off for Honda.

By the same token, you do not want to go this way with sports type or high end luxury models. You need bespoke powertrain options, unique looks, manual transmissions, etc. These offerings need to be special, and make the owner feel special. They are not profit centers, they are brand builders and halo vehicles. Not everything has to be unique, but you have to offer enough difference to make the offering stand out. If the looks are going to be generic to the model, you had better make sure the powertrain and performance stand out. If you give it unique looks/sheetmetal, then consumers will accept a carryover powertrain more readily. But if you try and add some gingerbread in the looks department and throw in a generic corporate powerplant, buyers aren't going to be happy. Parts-bin cars are fine, as long as people don't feel like, or are not reminded that they are driving one.

Maybe the RDX is a sign of hope at Honda. I'm pessimistic, but time will tell.

SC




We looked at the RDX when it first came out (I think it was an 05) and I was very disappointed with it. It did not look luxurious enough for something that ran an MSRP of $35K. The leather was hard, there was a lot plastic, the exterior was too plain. Our 04 TL, in comparison, was opulent, with fine finishes and nice touches everywhere.

We ended up with the Accord V6 MT6 Coupe which looked much better and had the real powertrain: a non VCM J30 that hauled ass.

At the market point of the RDX, the V6 makes a lot of sense, and gimmicks like the Turbo K23 make none... nevermind that it was not a smooth engine when introduced. Losing SH-AWD is sort of sad, but yes, I don't think most people in this market care. To them, AWD is AWD... the subtleties of SH-AWD are missing on them because they are (a) not going to push the car and (b) suburban luxo SUVs are not likely to be out on the ice and snow.

Now, where could the Turbo K23 be used? I agree with you about the TSX. It would be a perfect engine for a TSX-S...

BUT

I think it would be a killer engine in a TSX Wagon S. With a 240bhp K23T, MT6 and an LSD, this would be the killer wagon.. even if most sold with an AT6 and no LSD, this could be a "halo wagon"....

This engine (being smaller than the V6) would allow the Euro Accord to shrink as well (got too big).. so I think it would be a win win..

Like you, however, I'm not holding my breath on this.

Nonetheless.. the MDX, RDX and CRV are definite highlights. I figure the MDX, in particular, must be a cash cow. I hope they don't destroy as the rumors say that it's going to go significantly up market and price.


dicko
Profile for dicko
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-01-2012 21:25
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
The RDX follows the Honda tradition of striking out on the first generation but nailing the second generation (Odyssey is the best example). Let's hope that the Crosstour and Ridgeline are similarly "corrected" IF they survive to a second generation.
TonyEX
Profile for TonyEX
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-01-2012 21:45
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
dicko wrote:
The RDX follows the Honda tradition of striking out on the first generation but nailing the second generation (Odyssey is the best example). Let's hope that the Crosstour and Ridgeline are similarly "corrected" IF they survive to a second generation.


Quaalude... errr... Prelude.... ;-)
danielgr
Profile for danielgr
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-01-2012 23:40
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
notyper wrote:
[...] By the same token, you do not want to go this way with sports type or high end luxury models. You need bespoke powertrain options, unique looks, manual transmissions, etc. These offerings need to be special, and make the owner feel special. They are not profit centers, they are brand builders and halo vehicles. Not everything has to be unique, but you have to offer enough difference to make the offering stand out. If the looks are going to be generic to the model, you had better make sure the powertrain and performance stand out. If you give it unique looks/sheetmetal, then consumers will accept a carryover powertrain more readily. But if you try and add some gingerbread in the looks department and throw in a generic corporate powerplant, buyers aren't going to be happy. Parts-bin cars are fine, as long as people don't feel like, or are not reminded that they are driving one.
[...]SC
You know, the biggest problem you have in my humble opinion is that you fail to accept that the ways in which people feel "unique" at the wheel are changing.

I'll give you an example, which is the CR-Z, which to me perfectly fits the description of the kind of car you described here. And I'm actually pretty sure every single buyer out here feels pretty much "special"; I do. We are simply don't share the same aspirations.
- Bespoke powertrain options: check (only fun to drive hybrid ever made). Allows me to challenge both any hybrid's real world fuel economy and any sports car real road performance (may lose to an ace on both, but still good enough to trash anything else on the road at both challenges, and most of the less able drivers as well).
- Unique looks: check (actually better than most more expensive cars you can buy)
- Manual transmission: check (the only hybrid to do so).
- Makes the owner feel special = check (there is nothing like it in the market, may never be)

And I'll add to your list:
- affordable : check, because that is for sure one of the key aspects of owning any Honda I care for (including the special ones), which is that "I can buy it".

It is a car that actually needs not a single compromise on your list, yet it is still widely dismissed here because of it's lack of straight-line performance (which was not in your sensible list). Go figure, but at least me I don't think anyone needed to wait for the RDX to stop trying to be special and grow up to feel positive about Honda. Said it many times in the past years, I've never felt this good since the late 90's release of the Insight/S2000 combo, and it seems that the market keeps agreeing with me.
DCR
Profile for DCR
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 00:28
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
"Allows me to challenge both any hybrid's real world fuel economy and any sports car real road performance"

The CR-Z? Are you fucking kidding me?

The last thing you are is humble.

notyper
Profile for notyper
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 00:58
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
I don't have any problems Daniel. I buy what I want. Unfortunately for Honda, that amounts to about $125k over the last 10 years (new car purchases only) that they didn't get. And I'd estimate another $50-$60k in the next couple years that they'll miss out on again.

I'd like to buy a Honda again. I really would. I love my S2000 and would dearly like a follow up. I would love to buy a new, proper NSX. Honda's DNA is still good, but they've been putting out mutants, not evolutions lately. I don't think it'll happen, but I am more than intellectually capable of holding onto this desire for Honda to recapture past glory while spending my money with other OEMs until (if ever) they do. Why do you think I'm still here? I seek to influence Honda in more ways than just withholding my money from them. How many people like me would it take for Honda to wake up? 1000? 10,000? Abandoning enthusiasts like me who not only were loyal buyers, but also promoters of the brand (to the point of spearheading enthusiast websites like this for no pay) is stupid. And I'll bet it has cost them billions already.

As for your CR-Z - it's an epic failure. But you know what, it's neither a sports type of high end luxury model, so why would you even bring it up in this context? It does not offer any sport. It's slow, it has very low limits, it understeers heavily and it has poor brakes. It is between 10-20 seconds/lap slower around a 2 minute race track than any mid-priced hot hatch, let alone a real sports car. Being different is not enough (see Veloster for another failed example - although it'll probably outsell the CR-Z)

And really, you can't be so naive and inexperienced as to believe that you could really challenge any sports car's real world performance, could you? Unless you're both stuck in a traffic jam, even a neophyte will give you a run for your money in a new Ford Focus, let alone a real performance car. As for looks, well, that's subjective, but the 2nd gen CRX-Si looked much better IMO. Too much extraneous crap on the CR-Z.

As I see it, and I'm not humble about it at all, your problem is that you can't accept that Honda has made some colossal blunders the last 5-6 years. You are not capable of both loving what the brand has represented and yet still seeing that it is headed in a bad direction. I can hold these two disparate things in my mind at the same time.

But hey, you go on enthusing about an inferior hybrid system, decontented engines, dumbed down chassis and such. Honda needs suckers like you. And the more of you there are, the longer it'll take for them to wake up and start doing things right (like the RDX revamp). Everyone say "Thanks Daniel" for helping prolong Honda's rut.

SC
330R
Profile for 330R
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 01:21
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Thanks Daniel.





saitamahonda
Profile for saitamahonda
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 05:59
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
danielgr wrote:
notyper wrote:
[...] By the same token, you do not want to go this way with sports type or high end luxury models. You need bespoke powertrain options, unique looks, manual transmissions, etc. These offerings need to be special, and make the owner feel special. They are not profit centers, they are brand builders and halo vehicles. Not everything has to be unique, but you have to offer enough difference to make the offering stand out. If the looks are going to be generic to the model, you had better make sure the powertrain and performance stand out. If you give it unique looks/sheetmetal, then consumers will accept a carryover powertrain more readily. But if you try and add some gingerbread in the looks department and throw in a generic corporate powerplant, buyers aren't going to be happy. Parts-bin cars are fine, as long as people don't feel like, or are not reminded that they are driving one.
[...]SC
You know, the biggest problem you have in my humble opinion is that you fail to accept that the ways in which people feel "unique" at the wheel are changing.

I'll give you an example, which is the CR-Z, which to me perfectly fits the description of the kind of car you described here. And I'm actually pretty sure every single buyer out here feels pretty much "special"; I do. We are simply don't share the same aspirations.
- Bespoke powertrain options: check (only fun to drive hybrid ever made). Allows me to challenge both any hybrid's real world fuel economy and any sports car real road performance (may lose to an ace on both, but still good enough to trash anything else on the road at both challenges, and most of the less able drivers as well).
- Unique looks: check (actually better than most more expensive cars you can buy)
- Manual transmission: check (the only hybrid to do so).
- Makes the owner feel special = check (there is nothing like it in the market, may never be)

And I'll add to your list:
- affordable : check, because that is for sure one of the key aspects of owning any Honda I care for (including the special ones), which is that "I can buy it".

It is a car that actually needs not a single compromise on your list, yet it is still widely dismissed here because of it's lack of straight-line performance (which was not in your sensible list). Go figure, but at least me I don't think anyone needed to wait for the RDX to stop trying to be special and grow up to feel positive about Honda. Said it many times in the past years, I've never felt this good since the late 90's release of the Insight/S2000 combo, and it seems that the market keeps agreeing with me.



I thoroughly enjoyed my test drive of both the Crz and Insight. I still love driving my 02 crv and take pride hand washing and armor-alling it back to a near pristine state but I must say it really has a noticeable level of engine and road noise. Driving the Crz and insight reminded me of the feeling of sitting in my wife's 07 tl for the first time. Both the Crz and insight feel way more solid and are much quieter than my 02V. The insights road noise did not bother me at all and the Crz felt as tough as my brother's 3 series. I've owned a 86 legend, 95 civic coupe ex before the crv and I love how the crv and Crz both have the same fun to drive character as my civic did. It's nimbleness and how tossable it was got me hooked. The tl has the same buttery v6 with smooth power delivery feel the legend had with a better transmission and engine mounts (legend's engine was too powerful for the mounts and tranny). I' m one of those who never listens to music when driving and I refuse to use ac. I love open windows and the Honda engine is music to my ears. I could go for less road noise but if I were to choose between that or better tactile/sensory feedback, I choose the latter. What it all comes down to is balance.

I drove my brothers 2011 335d recently and while it was a monster to drive it was not at all confidence inspiring. Sure it was responsive like an FR should be, but it felt muted with no tactile feedback. With my crv and also when driving the Crz it felt as if I was on all fours with my palms to the pavement - the car felt like an extension to my nervous system. While the Rdx loses its coveted sh-awd I'd have no problems with it so long as it retains the Honda feel. the current crv which shares the same awd as the Rdx seems to have a little less feel but improved compliance. As long as Honda stays true to their principles of balance and efficiency it doesn't need a stand out design or drivetrain. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!


HONDA AFVM
Profile for HONDA AFVM
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 08:02
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
danielgr wrote:
notyper wrote:
[...] By the same token, you do not want to go this way with sports type or high end luxury models. You need bespoke powertrain options, unique looks, manual transmissions, etc. These offerings need to be special, and make the owner feel special. They are not profit centers, they are brand builders and halo vehicles. Not everything has to be unique, but you have to offer enough difference to make the offering stand out. If the looks are going to be generic to the model, you had better make sure the powertrain and performance stand out. If you give it unique looks/sheetmetal, then consumers will accept a carryover powertrain more readily. But if you try and add some gingerbread in the looks department and throw in a generic corporate powerplant, buyers aren't going to be happy. Parts-bin cars are fine, as long as people don't feel like, or are not reminded that they are driving one.
[...]SC
You know, the biggest problem you have in my humble opinion is that you fail to accept that the ways in which people feel "unique" at the wheel are changing.

I'll give you an example, which is the CR-Z, which to me perfectly fits the description of the kind of car you described here. And I'm actually pretty sure every single buyer out here feels pretty much "special"; I do. We are simply don't share the same aspirations.
- Bespoke powertrain options: check (only fun to drive hybrid ever made). Allows me to challenge both any hybrid's real world fuel economy and any sports car real road performance (may lose to an ace on both, but still good enough to trash anything else on the road at both challenges, and most of the less able drivers as well).
- Unique looks: check (actually better than most more expensive cars you can buy)
- Manual transmission: check (the only hybrid to do so).
- Makes the owner feel special = check (there is nothing like it in the market, may never be)

And I'll add to your list:
- affordable : check, because that is for sure one of the key aspects of owning any Honda I care for (including the special ones), which is that "I can buy it".

It is a car that actually needs not a single compromise on your list, yet it is still widely dismissed here because of it's lack of straight-line performance (which was not in your sensible list). Go figure, but at least me I don't think anyone needed to wait for the RDX to stop trying to be special and grow up to feel positive about Honda. Said it many times in the past years, I've never felt this good since the late 90's release of the Insight/S2000 combo, and it seems that the market keeps agreeing with me.


"D"........

I understand your point, VERY WELL.........BUT! Shawn is correct in many points. I too love the CR-Z.....Think it's a great car, the 1st gen RDX, blah! it looked deformed, unmatched.........

There is an ass for every seat, but when you come out with SO MANY "Odd" cars, RL, ZDX, CR-Z, Element, Crosstour and Ridgeline and nobody is buying them and you just let them continue to exist with out scrambling to fix them.........?????? I mean WTF........Someone at Honda is reading the tea leaves with the RDX, redoing the Civic (which had it's flaws, but could have remained and sold well, but would have aged quick) in a hurry............Gave the RLX and NSX a real power train that will make it class leading...........

Point to you is when you make this statement; "I'll give you an example, which is the CR-Z, which to me perfectly fits the description of the kind of car you described here. And I'm actually pretty sure every single buyer out here feels pretty much "special"

The problem, there isn't enough people to support what you are saying and it is a shame.........but the truth. As a sales person, it's a hard thing to do, watch great cars collect dust on a lot as people SHUN them because of their perception..........Build for the masses..........not for a few hundred a month..........
JIRZLEE
Profile for JIRZLEE
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 10:35
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
An Si version of the CRZ would do wonders for the perception issue of both the model and the brand as a whole.
Ganplosive
Profile for Ganplosive
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 10:44
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Daniel's in Japan isn't he? The Japanese are having a blast with the CRZ from what I remember. Surely he's not the only one feeling this way about the model. But like many others have said as well, the model didn't receive the same enthusiasm State-side
HONDA AFVM
Profile for HONDA AFVM
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 11:28
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
JIRZLEE wrote:
An Si version of the CRZ would do wonders for the perception issue of both the model and the brand as a whole.

I agree, even if they put a 1.8 Civic 140hp plant in it, it would be a rocket ship. Add 4WS and BAM! you have a winner for 25K with NAVI......
Chocs
Profile for Chocs
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 13:35
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
HONDA AFVM wrote:
JIRZLEE wrote:
An Si version of the CRZ would do wonders for the perception issue of both the model and the brand as a whole.

I agree, even if they put a 1.8 Civic 140hp plant in it, it would be a rocket ship. Add 4WS and BAM! you have a winner for 25K with NAVI......

eSHAWD would be a blast! :>

But really. I believe the CR-Z wasn't initially planned for sale in the US, and it was optimized for driving in Japan where the roads AFAIK are completely different.
TonyEX
Profile for TonyEX
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 13:58
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
From the side... you and Daniel are funny.

Daniel is into the fuel efficiency side and writing from Japan where a powerful car is a status thing but will never be used and gas is sold in 16oz cans.

Shawn is into the power side and writing from the SouthWest where a powerful car can and will be used and gas is still reasonably cheap and sold in 20 and 30 gallon increments (OK, 12 for those of us in Civics)

Daniel loves the current tack at HMC with its efficiency, the CR-Z makes sense in Japan.

Shawn is upset that AHM is pulling back from the enthusiast cars.. no Type Rs, no high winding engines, emasculated Si's built for commuting, not the race track.

I can understand both sides.

Now then... the bottom line is that Honda DNA is EFFICIENCY with a wicked lust for POWER.. ;-) HMC is gone too far to the efficiency side, particularly all that crap about CO2 which is a malarkey being foisted by global political groups.

(Daniel, DO NOT argue this.. it is true.. global warming is not about the environment, is about global control).

Any how, just as racing is the crucible for design, powerful efficient engines were the result of HMC's penchant for going racing. I think HMC needs to go back and rethink their strategy here. Honda is RED and WHITE... not green.....
Colin
Profile for Colin
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 17:06
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
TonyE wrote:
Any how, just as racing is the crucible for design, powerful efficient engines were the result of HMC's penchant for going racing. I think HMC needs to go back and rethink their strategy here. Honda is RED and WHITE... not green.....

Funny you mention racing. It is not lost on me that at the Indy 500, the HPD built Honda engines had the same power/speed as the Ilmore built Chevy's but were going 3 laps further on a tank of ethanol. Had Randy Bernard not extended the last caution period, all the Chevy runners would have had to pit for fuel with a few laps remaining. My god, it could have been Honda in the top 10 positions even including Sato!?
cforez
Profile for cforez
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 18:53
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Colin wrote:

Funny you mention racing. It is not lost on me that at the Indy 500, the HPD built Honda engines had the same power/speed as the Ilmore built Chevy's but were going 3 laps further on a tank of ethanol. Had Randy Bernard not extended the last caution period, all the Chevy runners would have had to pit for fuel with a few laps remaining. My god, it could have been Honda in the top 10 positions even including Sato!?



This is probably the reason Honda brought the engine development back in house.


MalcolmR
Profile for MalcolmR
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-02-2012 23:16
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
cforez wrote:
Colin wrote:

Funny you mention racing. It is not lost on me that at the Indy 500, the HPD built Honda engines had the same power/speed as the Ilmore built Chevy's but were going 3 laps further on a tank of ethanol. Had Randy Bernard not extended the last caution period, all the Chevy runners would have had to pit for fuel with a few laps remaining. My god, it could have been Honda in the top 10 positions even including Sato!?



This is probably the reason Honda brought the engine development back in house.




.
Nicely put Colin, cforez and TonyE.
"Honda is RED and WHITE... not green....."

With its engineering supremacy Honda would now be kicking ass on power, efficiency, real environmental friendliness and fun if it had not taken on the pseudo-green global warming rubbish. TonyE, you're on target.

The world's best engineers derailed by bullshit. And Japanese fashion trends.

Get 'em back on track so they can do their real job.

Malcolm

:)
saitamahonda
Profile for saitamahonda
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-03-2012 00:09
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
TonyE wrote:
From the side... you and Daniel are funny.

Daniel is into the fuel efficiency side and writing from Japan where a powerful car is a status thing but will never be used and gas is sold in 16oz cans.

Shawn is into the power side and writing from the SouthWest where a powerful car can and will be used and gas is still reasonably cheap and sold in 20 and 30 gallon increments (OK, 12 for those of us in Civics)

Daniel loves the current tack at HMC with its efficiency, the CR-Z makes sense in Japan.

Shawn is upset that AHM is pulling back from the enthusiast cars.. no Type Rs, no high winding engines, emasculated Si's built for commuting, not the race track.

I can understand both sides.

Now then... the bottom line is that Honda DNA is EFFICIENCY with a wicked lust for POWER.. ;-) HMC is gone too far to the efficiency side, particularly all that crap about CO2 which is a malarkey being foisted by global political groups.

(Daniel, DO NOT argue this.. it is true.. global warming is not about the environment, is about global control).

Any how, just as racing is the crucible for design, powerful efficient engines were the result of HMC's penchant for going racing. I think HMC needs to go back and rethink their strategy here. Honda is RED and WHITE... not green.....



Wow, and astronauts never landed on the moon too? Carbon emissions are bad period. Dioxide and monoxide both. Carbon dioxide not so bad since plants can use it to GROW. Oh but wait, we cut down many rainforests, there are far less trees to use the carbon and convert it into oxygen. Humans affect the planet in adverse ways, and the Japanese want the best quality of life and in order to achieve that they want to reduce gasoline combustion emissions. Honda is striking a balance with its products with the fit ev coming out this summer. Why don't you give it a test drive and see what an ev car can deliver in terms of fun? If doesn't suit you get something that you like. Don't go around touting political ignorance, it doesn't make you sound very credible at all.
saitamahonda
Profile for saitamahonda
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-03-2012 00:13
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Look up Honda and union of concerned scientists. This is a no brainer.
mobis21
Profile for mobis21
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-03-2012 01:07
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
The RDX I think could become Acura's best seller.
notyper
Profile for notyper
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-03-2012 11:50
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
saitamahonda wrote:

Wow, and astronauts never landed on the moon too? Carbon emissions are bad period. Dioxide and monoxide both. Carbon dioxide not so bad since plants can use it to GROW. Oh but wait, we cut down many rainforests, there are far less trees to use the carbon and convert it into oxygen. Humans affect the planet in adverse ways, and the Japanese want the best quality of life and in order to achieve that they want to reduce gasoline combustion emissions. Honda is striking a balance with its products with the fit ev coming out this summer. Why don't you give it a test drive and see what an ev car can deliver in terms of fun? If doesn't suit you get something that you like. Don't go around touting political ignorance, it doesn't make you sound very credible at all.



Here we go again. Acuse someone of ignorance while you're spouting bullshit? That's a paddlin. Tell me, even listening to the global warmistas out there, have temperatures gone up over the last decade? Yeah, that's what I thought, no, even though CO2 levels have increased.

I'm so sick of people like you parroting ridiculous lines. Carbon emissions are bad, period? Ok, stop emitting then. Just stop. Stop breathing you stupid fucking idiot. Take your own medicine you simpering hypocrite.

Here's a little tip for you before you off yourself tonight. Human beings are also part of nature. We affect our environment like everything else. That we are the most prolific builders and the species most capable of impacting our environment does nothing to change that, but it also doesn't mean that our changes are bad per se.

What you're saying is that the changes that mankind makes to its environment are less preferable than the changes that other species make. Good to know. In which case, again, you should stop breathing. You and I are mortal enemies because you believe that humans are less preferable to others. I happen to like my species and, if forced to choose, will always choose humanity.

Sad thing is, if you'd actually look deeper into the facts, you wouldn't be so inclined to remove yourself from the population. On average, forest cover in the world is doing quite well. Net forest cover in North America, Central America, Australia, Europe and Asia has actually been flat to slightly increasing over the last 15 years. It's only in the poorest regions like Africa and parts of South America where forest coverage has suffered. Why? People need the land to grow food, they need wood for fuel, they need to survive, and they are living in a relatively primitive state. But you know what, as the standard of living comes up and these populations can begin using more efficient fuels (like oil, gas, etc.) the rate of deforestation will come down, and then, eventually, it'll even go up. It's all part of the natural balance. A growing human population will change the makeup of its environment towards more food crops and fewer forests until such time as equilibrium is reached (meaning the human population minimizes malnourishment/starvation, reaches a certain standard of living, birth rates level off or decline, etc.).

In the meantime, plants love CO2. In fact, they love it in very high concentrations. Below about 250ppm, photosythesis suffers, below 200ppm it nearly stops. We were only in the 280ppm range 100 years ago. C3 plants, such as rice, wheat, soybeans, and most vegetables and fruits dramatically increase their efficiency as CO2 levels climb well past 1000ppm. Not only that, they use less water as CO2 levels climb.

So instead of worrying about CO2 because someone who wants to make money off of carbon taxes and control your lifestyle told you that its bad, you should be spending your time helping, investing or campaigning for the rapid dissemination of modern technology to sub-saharan Africa and the wilds of South America. Work to provide them with inexpensive ways to filter water, have electricity, fossil fueled cars, modern medicine and such. The faster their standards of living and life expectancy come up, the sooner their birth rates will stabilize, their rate of deforestation will come down, and they'll be contributing more to the overall world economy. Win-win for everyone. And maybe you won't feel the need to end it all. You may be an idiot, but you're still human and I'd hate to see you go.

SC
Waldo
Profile for Waldo
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-03-2012 13:22
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
notyper, spot on!
notyper
Profile for notyper
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-03-2012 13:49
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
I just can't take it anymore. I used to try and be more civil in these matters, but it just doesn't work.

The idea that those who have climbed highest need to fall back to the level of those who are still climbing is just so anti-human it angers me when I hear it.

SC
integrator
Profile for integrator
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-03-2012 14:43
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Ganplosive wrote:
Daniel's in Japan isn't he? The Japanese are having a blast with the CRZ from what I remember. Surely he's not the only one feeling this way about the model. But like many others have said as well, the model didn't receive the same enthusiasm State-side

in the JDM, having a car with the CRZ's 1.5L of displacement is a real luxury. So I understand that they have a really different perspective on what is affordable performance. Personally, I think the Insight and CRZ completely missed the mark in the US market. More for you, Daniel...but how many CRZ's can such a small nation purchase? I think Honda will see it as a disappointment saleswise as well, despite your love of the vehicle.

btw- the thing the cheerleaders here miss is that 'enthusiasts' dont ONLY buy the performance models... but when they have a performance model they can buy and love, they also purchase other Honda vehicles. Most in the US don't only have ONE vehicle... like a Integra and a CRV. Performance is good for the rest of the business as well.
ClementZ
Profile for ClementZ
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-03-2012 17:37
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
notyper wrote:
saitamahonda wrote:

Wow, and astronauts never landed on the moon too? Carbon emissions are bad period. Dioxide and monoxide both. Carbon dioxide not so bad since plants can use it to GROW. Oh but wait, we cut down many rainforests, there are far less trees to use the carbon and convert it into oxygen. Humans affect the planet in adverse ways, and the Japanese want the best quality of life and in order to achieve that they want to reduce gasoline combustion emissions. Honda is striking a balance with its products with the fit ev coming out this summer. Why don't you give it a test drive and see what an ev car can deliver in terms of fun? If doesn't suit you get something that you like. Don't go around touting political ignorance, it doesn't make you sound very credible at all.



Here we go again. Acuse someone of ignorance while you're spouting bullshit? That's a paddlin. Tell me, even listening to the global warmistas out there, have temperatures gone up over the last decade? Yeah, that's what I thought, no, even though CO2 levels have increased.

I'm so sick of people like you parroting ridiculous lines. Carbon emissions are bad, period? Ok, stop emitting then. Just stop. Stop breathing you stupid fucking idiot. Take your own medicine you simpering hypocrite.

Here's a little tip for you before you off yourself tonight. Human beings are also part of nature. We affect our environment like everything else. That we are the most prolific builders and the species most capable of impacting our environment does nothing to change that, but it also doesn't mean that our changes are bad per se.

What you're saying is that the changes that mankind makes to its environment are less preferable than the changes that other species make. Good to know. In which case, again, you should stop breathing. You and I are mortal enemies because you believe that humans are less preferable to others. I happen to like my species and, if forced to choose, will always choose humanity.

Sad thing is, if you'd actually look deeper into the facts, you wouldn't be so inclined to remove yourself from the population. On average, forest cover in the world is doing quite well. Net forest cover in North America, Central America, Australia, Europe and Asia has actually been flat to slightly increasing over the last 15 years. It's only in the poorest regions like Africa and parts of South America where forest coverage has suffered. Why? People need the land to grow food, they need wood for fuel, they need to survive, and they are living in a relatively primitive state. But you know what, as the standard of living comes up and these populations can begin using more efficient fuels (like oil, gas, etc.) the rate of deforestation will come down, and then, eventually, it'll even go up. It's all part of the natural balance. A growing human population will change the makeup of its environment towards more food crops and fewer forests until such time as equilibrium is reached (meaning the human population minimizes malnourishment/starvation, reaches a certain standard of living, birth rates level off or decline, etc.).

In the meantime, plants love CO2. In fact, they love it in very high concentrations. Below about 250ppm, photosythesis suffers, below 200ppm it nearly stops. We were only in the 280ppm range 100 years ago. C3 plants, such as rice, wheat, soybeans, and most vegetables and fruits dramatically increase their efficiency as CO2 levels climb well past 1000ppm. Not only that, they use less water as CO2 levels climb.

So instead of worrying about CO2 because someone who wants to make money off of carbon taxes and control your lifestyle told you that its bad, you should be spending your time helping, investing or campaigning for the rapid dissemination of modern technology to sub-saharan Africa and the wilds of South America. Work to provide them with inexpensive ways to filter water, have electricity, fossil fueled cars, modern medicine and such. The faster their standards of living and life expectancy come up, the sooner their birth rates will stabilize, their rate of deforestation will come down, and they'll be contributing more to the overall world economy. Win-win for everyone. And maybe you won't feel the need to end it all. You may be an idiot, but you're still human and I'd hate to see you go.

SC



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/Instrumental_Temperature_Record_%28NASA%29.svg/800px-Instrumental_Temperature_Record_%28NASA%29.svg.png
Temps have gone up in the past decade.

http://www.greenfacts.org/en/forests/l-3/2-extent-deforestation.htm#1p0
Forested areas may be increasing in area in "rich" countries, but the deforestation in "poor" countries (because Brazil is such a poor country, right?) offsets this.

http://www.grida.no/graphicslib/thumbs/1805c933-493c-4b85-be16-ad06eb342332/large/historical-trends-in-carbon-dioxide-concentrations-and-temperature-on-a-geological-and-recent-time-scale_a210.jpg
Plants may be at their most efficient at 1000+ppm, as you claim, but that hasn't happened at all in the past 400,000 years.
And if photosynthesis stops below 200ppm as you so claim, plants should be dying out every now and then, according to this graph. But they haven't. Yes, ppm levels have been at 280 100 years ago, but they never went above that until just recently. And they haven't been this high in about a billion years.

Here's a suggestion; how about we all stop blabbering on about complete bullshit and calling others idiots, especially if the information we use is complete garbage?
DrWhiner
Profile for DrWhiner
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-03-2012 20:03
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
integrator wrote:
btw- the thing the cheerleaders here miss is that 'enthusiasts' dont ONLY buy the performance models... but when they have a performance model they can buy and love, they also purchase other Honda vehicles. Most in the US don't only have ONE vehicle... like a Integra and a CRV. Performance is good for the rest of the business as well.

Yeah. I guess the guy that just bought a FR-S also ordered a xB, a xD and a IQ. LOL.
330R
Profile for 330R
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-03-2012 20:55
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
DrWhiner wrote:
Yeah. I guess the guy that just bought a FR-S also ordered a xB, a xD and a IQ. LOL.


Integrator's point is valid as there are numerous examples. I myself had an Integra Type-R and an Accord LX at the same time until last fall, when I sold the Accord and bought a Civic Si Sedan. What, you've never seen or heard of a "Honda family" before? Or does it uncomfortably defeat the purpose of your "LOL"s to acknowledge it?

The "guy that just bought a FR-S" recently bought a new CR-V for his wife, as he just mentioned in that thread. He had a Civic Si until several months ago. Owners of the enthusiast Hondas don't just stop there. Why should they? On the other hand, if frustrated, tired of waiting for nothing coming Honda enthusiasts finally wander off to other brands, it's not exactly inconceivable (yes, it means what I think it means) they could end up becoming a Toyota family, Ford family, whatever, when the time comes to replace their non-enthusiast rides.


notyper
Profile for notyper
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-04-2012 00:05
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
wiki-fucking-pedia? Really?

http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/global-temperature/

All the data from all the sources. Whether you want to use atmospheric temps (the most accurate) or land temp stations (least accurate), the trend from 2002 to 2012 is flat to slightly down and yet CO2 is climbing. Hmm, that whole theory about the sun being the primary driver of climate looks more reasonable - as it always has to anyone who actually has common sense.

As for the rest, what did you prove? Nothing. I already noted that the areas facing deforestation are doing so because they are poor populations who need food and fuel. And nothing you've stated debunks anything I said about CO2 and plants.

So bite me. This was a thread about the RDX. I didn't bring up the AGW lies that have been perpetrated on us, but I won't hesitate to come down like a load of bricks on anyone who wants to parrot them here. I'm done being polite.

SC
Powered by Honda
Profile for Powered by Honda
Re: Musings on the new RDX [View News Item]    (Score: 1, Normal) 06-04-2012 00:23
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
I love the RDX and its price/features you can't beat it in this class....however i hate the front fenders so HUGE.... looks awkward after seeing tons on the road I decided I dont like it the looks.

the MDX still looks alot better sleeker more honda. RDX feels like a bloated lexus.

you can see it best while 3/4 following it on highways.

 
Thread Page - [1] 2
Contact TOV | Submit Your Article | Submit Your Link | Advertise | TOV Shop | Events | Our Sponsors | TOV Archives
Copyright © 2012 Velocitech Inc. All information contained herein remains the property of Velocitech Inc.
The Temple of VTEC is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. TOV Policies and Guidelines - Credits - Privacy Policy