Some people will never end critizicing Honda marketing, but their US branch is doing some seriously good and fun advertising recently. IMHO both of those ILX adds are purposedly well made.
Here is another one I trully love and saw recently. It really kept me laughing for a while and remember it, both being good things (again IMHO).
danielgr wrote: Some people will never end critizicing Honda marketing, but their US branch is doing some seriously good and fun advertising recently. IMHO both of those ILX adds are purposedly well made.
Here is another one I trully love and saw recently. It really kept me laughing for a while and remember it, both being good things (again IMHO).
I agree those are two good spots, but "marketing" encompasses much more than television ads. And I think the part of Honda marketing that's being criticized the most isn't the television ads. The entire advertising process is handled out of house by RPA anyhow.
Besides the inconsistent front/front and front/rear shots when the passenger enters the car, I wonder why they elected to showcase the 6 speed version in the second commercial?
DCR wrote: I wonder why they elected to showcase the 6 speed version in the second commercial?
Because its precision crafted performance is very advanced and it inspires all of the other brands so it's very aspirational for the whole world! Just ask the puppet with the Legend...
Susie Rossick, manager of Acura advertising, tells Marketing Daily that the digital buy will hone in on sites popular with 25-to-34 year olds. "We have upped our percentage of digital spend higher than we have ever done for Acura, because this group spends much more time online than Baby Boomers," she says. "So we're doing things on Pitchfork, Bleacher Report, and Mashable, for example. We are doing homepage takeovers on MSN and Yahoo." The automaker is advertising on Xbox Live, Pandora and Good, and showing creative on YouTube, as well.
Susie Rossick, manager of Acura advertising, tells Marketing Daily that the digital buy will hone in on sites popular with 25-to-34 year olds. "We have upped our percentage of digital spend higher than we have ever done for Acura, because this group spends much more time online than Baby Boomers," she says. "So we're doing things on Pitchfork, Bleacher Report, and Mashable, for example. We are doing homepage takeovers on MSN and Yahoo." The automaker is advertising on Xbox Live, Pandora and Good, and showing creative on YouTube, as well.
Let's hope Susie & Acura haven't misjudged the target consumer again. They always make me nervous when they 'pinpoint' a very narrow range of consumers. Acura and Honda have a pretty lousy record of correctly picking these target markets.
Element - 20 & 30 yo looking for a cool outdoorsy ride. Instead popular with many empty-nesters and proved a great alternative to full size vans for many small businesses.
ZDX - doesn't matter what target market - it didn't exist & hasn't sold well
RDX 1st Gen - 30 something urban professionals more concerned with tech goodies than kids. As 2nd Gen sales are showing this could have been winner from the start without the harsh ride and turbo if they targeted it to young families and those downsizing from bigger SUVs.
My fear is the ILX is being mis-marketed and will appeal more to
baby-boomers looking for luxury features with lower fuel costs at a lower price tag. Its also may appeal as an entry-level luxury commuter car for working parents. Trouble with both those ideas is the TSX is a better option at nearly the same cost and offers more hp.
The ILX launch is important for Acura because the brand is still trying to recover its bearings after last year’s earthquake and tsunami in Japan crushed the sales momentum it had begun to build in the U.S. market. And, according to Acura brand executives, they’re still trying to capture a measure of respect.
“Even with restricted inventories, we still sold more cars last year than Lincoln and Cadillac and Volvo and Audi,”Mike Accavitti, Acura’s U.S. CMO, told me. “Audi gets all these accolades but we sell more cars than them. We’re 4th [in U.S. luxury sales volumes] this year even before high volumes of our 2 new products, ILX and [a new version of the RDX utility vehicle], have gotten onto dealer lots.”
The ILX launch is important for Acura because the brand is still trying to recover its bearings after last year’s earthquake and tsunami in Japan crushed the sales momentum it had begun to build in the U.S. market. And, according to Acura brand executives, they’re still trying to capture a measure of respect.
“Even with restricted inventories, we still sold more cars last year than Lincoln and Cadillac and Volvo and Audi,”Mike Accavitti, Acura’s U.S. CMO, told me. “Audi gets all these accolades but we sell more cars than them. We’re 4th [in U.S. luxury sales volumes] this year even before high volumes of our 2 new products, ILX and [a new version of the RDX utility vehicle], have gotten onto dealer lots.”
Thats not even a real accomplishment.... Everyone can beat Lincoln and Caddy and Volvo and Overpriced KINGS Audi. *Note Audi cars have the most profit on each model sold over any car*
Neal wrote: A gentleman doesn't need to talk of the competition he beat. And 4th place is nothing to brag about.
Wasn't Acura the number one selling luxury nameplate when it was first introduced in the 80's - granted this was before Lexus existed and the germans were not in to volume sales yet....
4th place? So sad...that being said, I wouldn't care if they were in 10th place as long as they were making cool products again...
danielgr wrote: Some people will never end critizicing Honda marketing, but their US branch is doing some seriously good and fun advertising recently. IMHO both of those ILX adds are purposedly well made.
Here is another one I trully love and saw recently. It really kept me laughing for a while and remember it, both being good things (again IMHO).
I agree those are two good spots, but "marketing" encompasses much more than television ads. And I think the part of Honda marketing that's being criticized the most isn't the television ads. The entire advertising process is handled out of house by RPA anyhow.
I love RPA, I worked there in the 90's - their office was right off of the 3rd street promenade in Santa Monica...that being said, I'm not sure they should have taken the Acura business...they do Honda fine (no matter what people say here), but you need a different mentality for Acura...but hey Honda hasn't fully grasped that concept, why would their ad agency?