They should have shipped a HSV 010-GT, yup right out from the Super-GT garages over and prepped THAT for the show. Tony Stark would have been someone who can afford to buy such car, have the connections to -force- Honda to sell him one, and more importantly, be crazy enough to drive one on the road.
WongKN wrote: They should have shipped a HSV 010-GT, yup right out from the Super-GT garages over and prepped THAT for the show. Tony Stark would have been someone who can afford to buy such car, have the connections to -force- Honda to sell him one, and more importantly, be crazy enough to drive one on the road.
Or the ESHAWD NSX concept (if it could move on its own) for that matter. The release for it is so close but yet totally missed, I really can't help thinking the timing is just totally messed up. Maybe that's why the Stark NSX wasn't built to have more details, or why it wasn't given more screentime, maybe it was a last minute thing to built the Tony Stark NSX for the movie instead.
Having the NSX actual concept in the movie would be really awesome
WongKN wrote: They should have shipped a HSV 010-GT, yup right out from the Super-GT garages over and prepped THAT for the show. Tony Stark would have been someone who can afford to buy such car, have the connections to -force- Honda to sell him one, and more importantly, be crazy enough to drive one on the road.
The road is one thing, but could you imagine that racing V8 rumbling past a crowd of people on the red carpet world premiere? Then RDJ revs it to 10,300 making the most prestigious figures wet themselves ;) It just lacks class.
But it would be nice dressed up like this:
Besides, with an active racing car they wouldn't be able to use it freely for promotions and the like. I agree with FISH-Chan; the timing is all wrong. Either the Avengers movie is three years too early, or the NSX-2 is three years too late.
Marek says the project began in June 2011, when he was handed the final pages of "The Avengers" script and told that a car was needed for Stark's parting shot. Initially the plan was to mock up just the rear of the car, since that's all that was needed for filming. But at the request of none other than the film's director and screenwriter Joss Whedon, it was decided to use a full car.
This meant that Marek and his team had three months to create a working, film-ready car in time for the scene to be filmed in New York City's Central Park during Labor Day weekend in 2011.
Deciding exactly what this film car would look like proved to be a bit of a challenge.
As you may know, Acura didn't officially unveil the NSX concept or even confirm the company planned to bring the car to market until the Detroit Auto Show in January 2012. Yet Acura knew that photos of the film car would hit the Internet immediately after filming its scene in September 2011, four months before the Detroit show. This was because New York City doesn't allow film crews to block public access while filming in Central Park.
CarPhreakD wrote: They showed another commercial (at least in Canada) during the movie previews that was far better than the RDX Avengers one:
... I was wondering where the car will appear, then NSX in the end confused me. When it showed them driving I thought the commercial was about a pedestrian model. So it's actually about "synergy between man and machine"...
Interesting detail... it looks like the driver was using a manual.
"synergy between man and machine" used to be a Honda trademark. The idea the commercial came through with, capturing that moment when you 'click' and understand the thing you're on is pretty genius.
I know I'm 10 days late to the party but here was what I thought of Acura and The Avengers.
Let me start off by saying what a great movie that was. Very interesting and lots of actions..
Acura on the other hand totally failed (not trollinh.. i own an Acura myself)... seriously.. why the hell would you sponsor a movie that barely showed your car.. in the beginning, they blew up a TL... the MDX had a 2 second clip during the emergency evacuation...
they showed the back of the rdx for a good 3 seconds and the NSX while starks was driving away.... Everyone at the movie when starks was driving away had the reaction of WOOOOOO nice car... why didn't they show it a lot more???? we were walking out of the movie and people were still talking about the NSX.. most reaction was.. i wonder what car that is.. whats brand is the "A"? maybe it stands for Avengers..
overall.. Good movie, however Acura Totally Failed at showing their vehicles... The freaken Hummers had more film time than all the Acuras combined!
I could be wrong but AFAIK Acura signed a multi-picture deal with Marvel, so it's not like Acura based its sponsorship on just The Avengers. More importantly, realize that Acura obviously does not have input into the script so it can't control when and how frequently its products show up (frankly, as a an avid movie buff and comic fanboy, I wouldn't want Acura to have such input anyway). OTOH I'm sure there are provisions within the sponsorship agreement that stipulate a minimum amount of screentime for Acura products, so as long as Acura had agreed to these provisions and is apparently happy with it, then that should be that.
Look, The Avengers franchise and the sponsorship doesn't stop here. Iron Man 3 is starting to film either this week or next--I wouldn't be surprised if we see a for-real working NXS here. Thor 2 is scheduled to start by year's end and Cap America 2 follows in early '13. And of course Avengers 2 is to be released May/14. There are talks of a Black Widow spin-off and an Ant-Man movie is being kicked around. Dr. Strange is supposed to be coming in '14 also. There are LOTS of opportunities for Acura to show off their wares in plenty of movies to come. Everyone just chill.