|
|
|
|
 |
TonyEX
 |
|
|
That tells me it's more of an SE than an Si.
|
kirk
 |
|
|
I reckon Sport=LX-S, which means alloys no sunroof?
|
mckillio
 |
|
|
No Navi on the 2.4l ILX...
|
xBeastx
 |
|
|
Just like the ILX...
|
CarGuyLee
 |
|
kirk wrote:
I reckon Sport=LX-S, which means alloys no sunroof?
|
I would really like a 'sport' with no sunroof, I hate that you have to have one with the EX
|
MuGen7Modulo
 |
|
|
Just like '12 TSX SE.
|
HondaJet
 |
|
|
Could Accord Sport be VERSUS Camry SE? Camry has L, LE, SE, XLE. Toyota Camry is the rival car, no one else. Makes sense, common sense.
|
TonyEX
 |
|
HondaJet wrote:
Could Accord Sport be VERSUS Camry SE? Camry has L, LE, SE, XLE. Toyota Camry is the rival car, no one else. Makes sense, common sense.
|
Honda be thyself.. screw toyota.. give us a proper Si.
|
Mechanic
 |
|
HondaJet wrote:Could Accord Sport be VERSUS Camry SE? Camry has L, LE, SE, XLE. Toyota Camry is the rival car, no one else. Makes sense, common sense.
|
I agree with you. It's a foregone conclusion that the engine, the only engine, will be the Earth Dreams Technology (EDT)(terrible name, btw) 2.4L 181-hp motor. My bet is the Sport model will have a 6-spd MT (great!), decent (and likely different) 17" alloys wheels, firmer shocks & springs but likely the same NHTSA ride height as the other models, and maybe a 22mm rear bar in place of the usual 17-19mm. With a little luck, the front seats may be bolstered differently, but that might involve more cost that HMC is prepared to invest in this model.
I really doubt the Sport model will be an "SE", as that traditionally has been the designation used with last-of-the-model-year Special Edition option.
And, sorry Tony, I have no desire to clutter up a Sport model with navigation systems, comm systems, moonroofs, etc.
I can live with this. This is a decent alternative to the constant whine of a CVT. Here's hoping the dealers order a bunch of them with MTs.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Thread Page - [1] |
|  |
|