[home][rumors and news][model release matrix][dealer network][desktop calendar][exhaust notes][tov forums][links][search][sponsors][garage][login]

Tire Rack Upgrade Garage
 Search for a Dealer:
 Canadian Flag US Flag
 Honda Acura
 ZIP  
2016 Honda Pilot starts at $29,995
More.......................
Takata Recall Expanded to nearly 34 Million Vehicles
More.......................
American Honda Reports April 2015 Sales
More.......................
Spied! We're not quite sure what this is
More.......................
The Uniquely Personal and Functional 2016 Honda HR-V Goes On Sale May 15
More.......................
Spied: 2016 Accord Coupe MMC
More.......................
Seen on the street: 2016 Honda Pilot
More.......................
New Technical Details of the Next Generation Acura NSX Revealed at SAE 2015 World Congress
More.......................
General Talk --> Re: "Tier 1" and what it means
Join Discussion......
Today's Reading Links --> Re: C&D HR-V CVT AWD review!
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: IndyCar.......All Hell broke out behind close doors!
Join Discussion......
Professional Motorsports --> Re: Mclaren Honda MP4/30 Update(5-28-15)
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Craziest S600 ever!
Join Discussion......
TOV Asia --> Re: JDM Honda new/FMC models for 2015
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Toyota Sports Cars(Suburu,Mazda,BMW)... WOW...who would think that?
Join Discussion......
Audio & Electronics --> Re: Android Auto free upgrade for 2015 Hyundai Sonata
Join Discussion......
HR-V/Vezel --> Re: Drove an LX today
Join Discussion......
Strictly Technical --> Re: Honda VTEC Turbo -> No Direct Injection (at least in Japan)
Join Discussion......
ILX --> Re: 1st Generation ILX Reviews
Join Discussion......
HR-V/Vezel --> Re: HR-V Fever......So what do i do now??? HELP!
Join Discussion......
General Talk --> Re: Honda power generators
Join Discussion......
NSX --> Re: NSX new info!!!
Join Discussion......
IMA/Hybrids --> Re: When do we see the 1L turbo mated to an IMA?
Join Discussion......
TOV Video: 2016 Honda Pilot walkaround with Marc Ernst
Read Article....................
TOV Video: 2016 Honda Pilot First Drive
Read Article....................
2016 Honda Pilot PR Photo Gallery
Read Article....................
2016 Honda HR-V PR Photo Gallery
Read Article....................
TOV Photo Gallery: 2015 New York Auto Show
Read Article....................
Honda S660 PR Photo Gallery
Read Article....................

[fancy] [flat] [simple]
TOV Forums > Today's Reading Links > > Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33

Go to:

Viewing Threshold (What is this?)

Thread Page - [1]
Author
  Post New Thread
typer_801
Profile for typer_801
2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 10:16
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
The new 1.6L Ecoboost Ford Escape is EPA rated at 23 city/33 hwy. That's with 178 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque.

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/27/2013-ford-escape-1-6l-ecoboost-officially-rated-at-23-33-mpg/

Didn't Ito-san say something like Honda would have class leading fuel economy in EVERY segment by 201X with the reveal of Earth Dreams powertrain?
JonBoy
Profile for JonBoy
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 10:45
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Every EcoBoost motor is having issues with hitting EPA ratings consistently. I'd expect this to be no different...
CarGuyLee
Profile for CarGuyLee
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 13:07
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
JonBoy wrote:
Every EcoBoost motor is having issues with hitting EPA ratings consistently. I'd expect this to be no different...


Where can I find that info in print?

I'm kind of disappoited in these numbers, especially when you compare it to the old 2.5. 1 less city, 2 less hwy
BachelorFrog
Profile for BachelorFrog
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 14:50
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Under boost, the 23/33 rating is not possible. You need to drive like a grandmother to achieve that rating.

Look at motortrend's Exploder EB reviews, its a failure.


xman
Profile for xman
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 15:16
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
I do not trust EPA ratings much. My '12 Odyssey gets 21 mpgs (rated 19/28), and my '07 335i manual rated 17/26 is getting 25 for the same exact drive for my commute to work.
MasterOfDaDomain
Profile for MasterOfDaDomain
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 15:30
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
I'd still go with Mazda CX-5. The combined fuel economy will be better than Escape.

Time for a comparison test!
RSX
Profile for RSX
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 15:34
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
typer_801 wrote:
The new 1.6L Ecoboost Ford Escape is EPA rated at 23 city/33 hwy. That's with 178 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque.

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/27/2013-ford-escape-1-6l-ecoboost-officially-rated-at-23-33-mpg/

Didn't Ito-san say something like Honda would have class leading fuel economy in EVERY segment by 201X with the reveal of Earth Dreams powertrain?



Yes he did. Keep in mind that all the new Honda engines with direct injection will come shortly.
TonyEX
Profile for TonyEX
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 16:57
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
typer_801 wrote:
The new 1.6L Ecoboost Ford Escape is EPA rated at 23 city/33 hwy. That's with 178 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque.

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/27/2013-ford-escape-1-6l-ecoboost-officially-rated-at-23-33-mpg/

Didn't Ito-san say something like Honda would have class leading fuel economy in EVERY segment by 201X with the reveal of Earth Dreams powertrain?



Check this review of the Ford Explorer with an ecoBoost engine..

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1108_ford_explorer_ecoboost_test/

EPA 25 to 35 mpg...
Observed 19.9 and it was doggone slow.

Here's the Edge Ecoboost

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1203_2012_ford_edge_sel_ecoboost_first_test/


EPA 21/30
Observed less than 19.

I think the Ford is putting very small engines in too large vehicles and then running it through the EPA cycle which is really way too light. Then they publish the EPA numbers and 90% of the "reviews" take that for granted.

Every so often you will see a real road review, or you'll see owners report the real world mileage numbers and you see that actual efficiency is well short of the mark.

That plus the fact that driving a vehicle with a too small engine really forces the driver to push the engine.... which for a turbo really makes it a chore....

If someone should be sued on EPA numbers, it shouldn't be Honda.


auto_enthu
Profile for auto_enthu
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 17:08
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply


Any turbo's EPA numbers are not reliable.
Also, not sure what the Ford's intention is behind making both 2.5L NA as well as 1.6L turbo engines available when their output difference is just 5HP.

Anyway, ED should easily top these numbers and its very likely that the current CRVs real world numbers are likely going to be higher than escape's real world numbers.



DrWhiner
Profile for DrWhiner
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 18:54
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
typer_801 wrote:
The new 1.6L Ecoboost Ford Escape is EPA rated at 23 city/33 hwy. That's with 178 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque. [...]

Didn't Ito-san say something like Honda would have class leading fuel economy in EVERY segment by 201X with the reveal of Earth Dreams powertrain?

From MT:
4WD HP TQ EPA City/Hwy
Escape 1.6L Turbo I-4 6AT 178 184 22 31
CR-V 2.4 I-4 5AT 185 163 22 30


The 4WD CR-V is just 1mpg short in hwy test cycle. nothing ground breaking, just continuous improvement.
Hondarulez
Profile for Hondarulez
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 19:17
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
DrWhiner wrote:
typer_801 wrote:
The new 1.6L Ecoboost Ford Escape is EPA rated at 23 city/33 hwy. That's with 178 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque. [...]

Didn't Ito-san say something like Honda would have class leading fuel economy in EVERY segment by 201X with the reveal of Earth Dreams powertrain?

From MT:
4WD HP TQ EPA City/Hwy
Escape 1.6L Turbo I-4 6AT 178 184 22 31
CR-V 2.4 I-4 5AT 185 163 22 30


The 4WD CR-V is just 1mpg short in hwy test cycle. nothing ground breaking, just continuous improvement.



That 1 mpg disadvantage will pretty much be gone when the ED + CVT combo arrives.
HONDA AFVM
Profile for HONDA AFVM
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 19:30
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
MasterOfDaDomain wrote:
I'd still go with Mazda CX-5. The combined fuel economy will be better than Escape.

Time for a comparison test!


I sat in a 2013 Escape, the rear seats are terrible......the dash is blah.........it feels small........
Midi_Amp
Profile for Midi_Amp
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-27-2012 21:41
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
CarGuyLee wrote:
JonBoy wrote:
Every EcoBoost motor is having issues with hitting EPA ratings consistently. I'd expect this to be no different...


Where can I find that info in print?

I'm kind of disappoited in these numbers, especially when you compare it to the old 2.5. 1 less city, 2 less hwy


Isn't this the exact same thing that happened with the old RDX? The turbo is constantly boosting the engine to move the chassis mass and took quite a hit on the mileage. Anything turbo and economical should be relegated to diesel or small cars. I'm all in with the turbo craze, but only for small cars, maybe something like those Keii cars.
Hondarulez
Profile for Hondarulez
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-30-2012 13:49
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
Midi_Amp wrote:
CarGuyLee wrote:
JonBoy wrote:
Every EcoBoost motor is having issues with hitting EPA ratings consistently. I'd expect this to be no different...


Where can I find that info in print?

I'm kind of disappoited in these numbers, especially when you compare it to the old 2.5. 1 less city, 2 less hwy


Isn't this the exact same thing that happened with the old RDX? The turbo is constantly boosting the engine to move the chassis mass and took quite a hit on the mileage. Anything turbo and economical should be relegated to diesel or small cars. I'm all in with the turbo craze, but only for small cars, maybe something like those Keii cars.



The RDX had low EPA ratings that match its real world mileage..so..I'd say that's more acceptable. I don't like cars that promise so much but underdeliver.
TonyEX
Profile for TonyEX
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-30-2012 14:04
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
DrWhiner wrote:
typer_801 wrote:
The new 1.6L Ecoboost Ford Escape is EPA rated at 23 city/33 hwy. That's with 178 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque. [...]

Didn't Ito-san say something like Honda would have class leading fuel economy in EVERY segment by 201X with the reveal of Earth Dreams powertrain?

From MT:
4WD HP TQ EPA City/Hwy
Escape 1.6L Turbo I-4 6AT 178 184 22 31
CR-V 2.4 I-4 5AT 185 163 22 30


The 4WD CR-V is just 1mpg short in hwy test cycle. nothing ground breaking, just continuous improvement.



Jeez.. didn't you read my post?

MT measured under 19 mpg during their test.

You're posting EPA numbers which is ridiculous. Anytime you take a small turbo engine, the EPA numbers are unlikely to ever be met when you take the car on the street.
civicw
Profile for civicw
Re: 2013 Ford Escape EPA Rated 23/33    (Score: 1, Normal) 04-30-2012 22:23
Reply to This Message Attach Quote to Reply
The way I look at Ecoboost, it's a great marketing gimmick to extract $$$ from buyers, and make them feel better about buying gas hogs like the Explorer and F-150.

Eventually, the word is going to get around that the extra $$$ for Ecoboost isn't worth it. Long term reliability is also unknown.
 
Thread Page - [1]
Go to:
Contact TOV | Submit Your Article | Submit Your Link | Advertise | TOV Shop | Events | Our Sponsors | TOV Archives
Copyright © 2014 Velocitech Inc. All information contained herein remains the property of Velocitech Inc.
The Temple of VTEC is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. TOV Policies and Guidelines - Credits - Privacy Policy
mobile: 0